Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Trial court erred in refusing to impose a constructive trust on funds from a home sale, based on fact neither party held title to the home, because trial court had the authority to impose a constructive trust using the proceeds of the home sale and it was not relevant that defendant did not hold title to the property. Vacated.
Department properly assessed UC contributions and properly concluded that 27 of employer's cleaners were not independent contractors, the Construction Workplace Misclassification Act applied to employer and 10 construction workers were also not independent contractors. Affirmed.
Defendant window company moved to compel arbitration in plaintiffs' action over leaking window installed by window company's subcontractor and court found the subcontractor agreement between company and subcontractor construction company was valid and enforceable and required construction company to abide by the arbitration clause in service contract between plaintiffs and window company. Motion granted.
Patrolling officer who fell asleep while driving was still acting in course of duties where the officer did not intentionally disregard work rules prohibiting sleeping on the job but inadvertently fell asleep after being mandated to work an overtime shift only a few hours after completing his regular shift. Arbitration award affirmed.
Plaintiff employee appealed the court's order sustaining defendant employer's preliminary objections to plaintiff's amended complaint. The court concluded that its order should be affirmed where plaintiff's retaliatory termination complaint was barred by the doctrine of res judicata.
Trial court erred in concluding PennDOT did not establish a prima facie case of plaintiff's out-of-state conviction of an alcohol-related driving offense requiring disqualification of his CDL but correctly found plaintiff's evidence established that he was not convicted on February 18, 2021 of an alcohol-related offense in Wisconsin that would require the disqualification of his CDL. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
District court erred in dismissing appellants' second amendment challenge to statutes banning 18-to-20-year-olds from carrying firearms outside their homes during a state of emergency because 18-to-20-year-olds were presumptively among "the people" to whom second amendment rights extended and court found no near equivalence or significant analogue between the burdens imposed by the historical statute cited by Commonwealth and those at issue here. Reversed.
Court declined to grant a motion for punitive damages in the form of a summary judgment motion where there were genuine issues of material fact as to defendants' culpability for a fatal motor vehicle accident. Plaintiff's motion granted in part and denied in part.
Premises liability defendants appealed the court's order granting reconsideration and vacating its earlier order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment. The court concluded that its decision should be affirmed where plaintiff's motion for reconsideration demonstrated the existence of a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether plaintiff saw a defect in a curb before she tripped and fell.
Commercial liability insurer appealed the court's order denying its petition to intervene for the limited purpose of submitting special jury interrogatories. The court concluded that the appeal should be denied where insurer's interrogatories belatedly sought to have the jury address coverage-related issues that fell outside the scope of the parties' lawsuit.