Pennsylvania | The Legal Intelligencer

On March 12, 2025, the EPA announced that it would initiate a “formal reconsideration” of the endangerment finding. In support of its position to undertake a formal reconsideration of the endangerment finding, the EPA cites the Supreme Court’s recent decision of Loper Bright v.Raimondo.

Since President Donald Trump was sworn into office earlier this year, there has been widespread discussion about the future of the IRA and its clean energy tax credits. To that end, Congress and the administration have already signaled their intent to modify and repeal several of the clean energy tax initiatives created by the IRA.

In a recent decision handed down by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Grant v. Grant, the court dealt with the effect of a self-conveyance of real property where a mother sought to sever a joint tenancy with her son.

"Here, plaintiff has tied her lung infection to Haleon’s product. Plaintiff alleged that she used the Robitussin product over a defined period approximately six weeks before the product was recalled because of its potential to cause lung infections," U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Costello for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania said. "Thus, plaintiff has alleged sufficient facts to establish the inference that she used the recalled product and that she contracted a lung infection after doing so."

This report should not be treated as legitimate news and instead it should be recognized for what it truly is: a sophisticated public relations campaign designed to manipulate public opinion and undermine confidence in our justice system.

Saxton & Stump is preparing to open its new office in downtown Pittsburgh’s landmark Union Trust Building, underscoring the firm’s long-term commitment to Western Pennsylvania and its expanding role in the region’s business and legal community.