Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
44 results for '* topic:"Intellectual Property"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-02-23
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Construction
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Wolson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2:23-cv-02880-JDW
Plaintiff moved to amend its complaint to add additional defendants and Lanham Act claims for trademark infringement and unfair competition to its action against defendant former employee who left and took confidential materials to competitor and court allowed amendment but required plaintiff to excise mentions of a false advertising claim. Granted in part.
Publication Date: 2024-02-09
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Pratter
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-513
Defendant moved to bifurcate the parties' trademark action into discrete liability and damages phases and court found disgorgement was an equitable remedy, court alone had to power to determine what equitable damages, if any, plaintiff would receive and bifurcation might improve juror comprehension. Motion granted.
Publication Date: 2023-10-27
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Freeman
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-2426
Plaintiffs appealed the district court's denial of relief in the form of seizure of defendants' property.
Publication Date: 2023-09-08
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-2821
Plaintiff appealed the grant of summary judgment for defendant.
Publication Date: 2023-01-16
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Construction | Legal Services | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Robreno
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-2589
Both parties sought attorney fees in plaintiff's copyright and Digital Millennium Copyright Act action after arbitrators found copyright infringement and awarded damages to plaintiff and court found defendant was not the prevailing party and awarded counsel fees to plaintiff but reduced the requested amount by one-third. Motion granted and motion denied.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Patrick S. Montoya, Ervin A. Gonzalez, Ervin A. Gonzalez
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2023-01-09
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Food and Beverage
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
Judge: District Judge Dodge
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-1224
Defendants sought summary judgment in plaintiff's trade secret misappropriation, trademark infringement, copyright violation and state law tort claims over a fudge recipe and photographs and court found disputes of fact precluded summary judgment on the trade secret claims, granted judgment to defendants on the trademark claims because the trademark was procured by fraud and on the copyright violations claims and denied summary judgment to defendant on the tortious interference, breach of contract and defamation claims. Motion granted
Publication Date: 2022-10-24
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Construction | Consulting | E-Commerce
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
Judge: District Judge Stickman
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2:21-cv-1851
Plaintiff Mold Medics and third party Shwackammer moved to dismiss individual defendant Rubino's counterclaims and third party complaint in a trademark infringement action and court found Rubino insufficiently pled his intentional interference with prospective contractual relations and Lanham Act unfair competition claims but did sufficiently state a claim for cancellation of plaintiff's registered mark. Motion granted in part and denied in part.
Publication Date: 2022-06-13
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Kenney
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0638
Plaintiff in trade dress infringement action moved to dismiss defendant's counterclaim requesting a declaration of non-infringement of a patent and court found there was no justiciable controversy and noted an infringement action did not automatically provide jurisdiction for other actions on patents allegedly relating to the same product. Motion granted.
Publication Date: 2022-05-16
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Entertainment and Leisure | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Marston
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0548
Defendant asked to proceed anonymously and that all identifying information remain under seal in plaintiff's copyright infringement action and court found defendant reasonably feared that disclosure of his name and other identifying information could negatively affect his current employment, future employment opportunities and his reputation and ordered the caption to continue to identify defendant by the John Doe pseudonym and ordered five documents remain under seal. Motion granted in part and denied in part.
Publication Date: 2022-04-25
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Consumer Products
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Tucker
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0435
Defendant moved for summary judgment in plaintiff's Lanham Act action asserting a false and misleading advertising slogan, "Australia's No. 1," and court found the slogan was puffery and inactionable, it was not literally false and plaintiff did not show consumers were misled or relied on the allegedly false advertising. Motion granted.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read