Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Remand of Office of Open Records determination ordering release of SEPTA surveillance footage was necessary to evaluate reasonableness of proposed redaction costs. Order of the OOR vacated and remanded.
Court had jurisdiction to extend the deadline to file a petition to set aside a nomination petition after granting a candidate mandamus relief giving the candidate more time to file an amended petition to cure defects. Objectors' petition to set aside granted, candidate's motion to dismiss denied.
Plaintiffs in data breach class action lacked standing where there was no allegation that their personal/protected information was published or misused. Defendants' motion to dismiss granted.
PennDOT sufficiently established a motorist's refusal of blood testing under the implied consent law where the motorist was given the implied consent warning form to read and did not expressly consent to testing until after police obtained a search warrant. Order of the trial court reversed.
Defendant filed a preliminary objection seeking to compel decedent's daughter to submit her survival act claims to binding arbitration. Preliminary objection sustained.
Defendant sought summary judgment in plaintiff's suit for personal injury. The court granted the motion where plaintiff failed to demonstrate defendant acted negligently in forcefully braking his vehicle to avoid an accident while plaintiff was unrestrained in the back seat.
In this §1925(a) opinion, the court urged the Superior Court to affirm its order overruling defendants' preliminary objections to the second amended complaint that claimed the court should have stricken statements that were "scandalous" and "impertinent" and could only be answered by disclosure of matters covered by the attorney-client privilege.
Board erred in finding employer's expert's testimony was not legally competent because independent medical examination doctor accepted the adjudicated work injuries and opined that claimant was fully recovered from those work injuries. Reversed.
Court vacated trial court's order granting appellees' preliminary objections to appellant's tortious interference counts on the basis of sovereign immunity because courts and all parties agreed the order was an error. Vacated.
Defendants sought summary judgment in plaintiff's action seeking injunctive and compensatory relief regarding defendants' fence. The court granted defendants' motion as to plaintiff's claims sounding in private nuisance where all evidence regarding the physical characteristics of defendants' fence indicated it was lawfully constructed, and plaintiff could not show the requisite "significant harm" on his assertion of private nuisance.