• In re Jack Buncher Found.

    Publication Date: 2024-02-09
    Practice Area: Corporate Governance
    Industry: Non-Profit
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Wallace
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 291 C.D. 2022

    Orphans' court erred in awarding attorneys' fees and costs to nonprofit foundation directors under §5782(c), in action alleging directors had exercised undue influence and breached their fiduciary duties, because neither the plain language of §5782(c) nor the parties' compromise permitted orphans' court to award attorneys' fees and costs against individuals who were never members and who could not bring a derivative action in the first place. Reversed.

  • In the Interest of J.F.

    Publication Date: 2024-02-09
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Stabile
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1774 EDA 2023

    Trial court committed legal error by preventing child's legal and best interest attorneys from participating in child's in camera interview in contravention of Pa.R.J.C.P. 1128(A)-(B) and 1134 during a dependency and reunification hearing. Vacated.

  • Bank of Am., N.A. v. Slaski

    Publication Date: 2024-02-09
    Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
    Industry: Financial Services and Banking
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
    Judge: Judge Higgins
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 6170 CV 2020

    Plaintiff brought a credit card collections action against defendant. The court entered judgment in favor of plaintiff for the amount of defendant's unpaid credit card balance, plus court costs.

  • Austin v. Lehigh & Northampton Transp. Auth.

    Publication Date: 2024-02-09
    Practice Area: Personal Injury
    Industry: Construction | Transportation
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Jubelirer
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 355 C.D. 2022

    Personal injury plaintiff appealed the trial court's entry of judgment against him. The court affirmed, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing plaintiff's motion to sever his personal injury suit from his employer's consolidated property damage case where evidence of the underlying accident was largely the same, although the parties' rights and liabilities differed.

  • Commonwealth v. Lawrence

    Publication Date: 2024-02-09
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Bowes
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 987 WDA 2022

    Court remanded dismissal of Post Conviction Relief Act petition where defendant supplemented with claims of ineffective assistance of PCRA counsel and PCRA court failed to adequately explain the reasons for dismissing the petition. Order of the PCRA court vacated, case remanded.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Wrongful Use of Civil Proceedings and Related Torts in Pennsylvania, Second Edition

    Authors: George Bochetto, David P. Heim, John A. O’Connell, Robert S. Tintner

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Hager v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp.

    Publication Date: 2024-02-09
    Practice Area: Employment Litigation
    Industry: Transportation
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge Bartle
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 23-3536

    Defendant moved to compel arbitration in plaintiff's Pennsylvania Whistleblower Law and Family and Medical Leave Act action asserting he was unlawfully terminated and court found there was an arbitration agreement, the agreement equivocated as to whether the parties agreed to invoke the Federal Arbitration Act and the agreement provided for arbitrator to decide threshold questions of arbitrability as well as issues of validity, enforceability, and unconscionability. Motion granted.

  • Hattay v. Streamline Solutions, LLC

    Publication Date: 2024-02-09
    Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
    Industry: Real Estate
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
    Judge: Judge Coyle
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 23014213

    In this §1925(a) opinion, the court asked the Superior Court to affirm its discretionary order denying defendants' pretextual motion to quash a subpoena to Michael Stillwell, the sole principal of both defendants, and for a protective order because defendants failed to proffer any justification for setting aside the order enforcing the subpoena and merely claimed the court had erred or abused its discretion and Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure 234.4, 3117, 4011, and 4012 support the court's discretionary decision.

  • Chester Upland Sch. Dist. v. 103 Commerce Drive ILP, LLC

    Publication Date: 2024-02-09
    Practice Area: Tax
    Industry: Education | Real Estate | State and Local Government
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Leavitt
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1272 C.D. 2022

    School district's complaint for declaratory and equitable relief from underassessment of property was barred by the statutory remedy under the Assessment Law. Order of the trial court affirmed.

  • United States v. Ruffin

    Publication Date: 2024-02-09
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
    Judge: District Judge Hornak
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2:13-cr-00138

    Court concluded that only one of defendant's underlying convictions, his federal carjacking conviction, was a "crime of violence" for Armed Career Criminal Act purposes and ordered a resentencing hearing. Motion granted.

  • In re: Appeal of Sesso

    Publication Date: 2024-02-09
    Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
    Industry: Real Estate | State and Local Government
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Jubelirer
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1006 C.D. 2021

    Trial court erred in reversing board's grant of a zoning variance because board did not err or abuse its discretion in finding that res judicata did not bar Total Custom Homes Inc. from filing the variance application and that TCH met its burden of proving its entitlement to the requested dimensional variance under the Hertzberg v. Zoning Hearing Bd., 721 A. 2d 43, standards. Reversed.