Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
The court issued an order denying defendant's pre-trial motions to suppress for unlawful search and entry, for unlawfully issued search warrant, illegal nighttime warrant, a request for discovery and inspection of evidence, but granted in part defendant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus on three charges of aggravated indecent assault forcible compulsion.
Appellant appealed the court's order granting appellee's petition for review and request for civil penalties pursuant to the Right-to-Know Law. The court concluded that its order should be affirmed where appellant had waived all of the issues that it raised on appeal due to its overly lengthy and redundant concise statement of issues complained of on appeal.
Appellant former teacher appealed the court's dismissal of his defamation and tortious interference claims against his school's former principal. Appellant further appealed the court's judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of his former employer, appellee school, and appellee school president. The court requested that its judgment on the jury verdict be affirmed and the case remanded for further proceedings with respect to appellant's defamation claim.
The court issued its §1925(a) opinion in support of its order assigning marital values to various pieces of property owned by the divorcing couple and its order of a 50/50 equitable distribution and asserted it did not abuse the broad discretion afforded judges in determining those questions and applying the factors set forth in 23 Pa. C.S.A. §3502(a).
Board properly denied claimant's petition as untimely filed because claimant did not appeal to the board, within 20 days of receiving WCJ's August 2021 order, and request that the board make its March 25, 2021 decision final so he could appeal to the court. Affirmed.
Court remanded residual functional capacity determination where there was no medical evidence to support the ALJ's determination of functional limitations in claimant's arms and hands, as it was undisputed claimant continued to suffer from carpal tunnel syndrome and cervical radiculopathy. Request for review granted in part.
Sports facility tax was facially unconstitutional as city failed to justify distinction between residents and nonresidents, and the offending language could not be severed from the statute as the enabling legislation only authorized imposition of the tax on nonresidents. Order of the trial court affirmed.
District court properly denied Assistant District Attorney's motion to dismiss §1983 charges against him, for fabricating evidence, on absolute immunity grounds because ADA's alleged conduct served an investigatory function and ADA was not entitled to absolute immunity. Affirmed.
Plaintiffs appealed the court's order reinstating sanctions previously imposed on counsel for both parties for failure to complete discovery and exchange expert reports pursuant to the court's medical malpractice case management order. The court concluded that its order should be affirmed.
Trial court properly transferred appellants' products liability/strict liability, negligence and breach of warranty action to Bucks county, where appellants resided, because there was no evidence demonstrating that manufacturer's contacts with Philadelphia county were continuous, habitual, or regular. Affirmed.