DOJ's Latest Attempt To Tame the Crypto-Creature: NCET
The formation of the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team heralds a focus of enforcement resources towards the financial ecosystem that allows ransomware and similar threats to flourish.
December 06, 2021 at 11:00 AM
9 minute read
Financial Services and BankingGone are the days when cryptocurrency could remain largely ignored and safely relegated to a dark corner of the internet: Today, even telephone and mortgage companies are beginning to accept payments in cryptocurrency. Yet simultaneously, 2020 saw a four-fold increase in ransom payments to cyber criminals, exceeding $400 million, with this sum primarily paid in cryptocurrency. As the threat posed by malicious cyber-actors continues to grow, so too must the vigilance of organizations that deal in crypto in various ways as the government's enforcement aspirations and capabilities concurrently expand. In the latest attempt to combat growing criminal activity in this area, on Oct. 6, 2021, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco of the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the formation of the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team (NCET). The NCET's formation heralds a focus of enforcement resources towards the financial ecosystem that allows ransomware and similar threats to flourish. Simultaneously, the government has sought to increase private-sector reporting of cyber-attacks, and signaled that enforcement actions may be brought against companies that fail to report such attacks. Prudence dictates that any entity dealing with cryptocurrency stay abreast of rapidly developing regulatory and enforcement efforts in this space, and that victims of cyber-attacks remain equally vigilant.
The NCET's Creation Was Likely Prompted by Growing Cyber-Attack Threats. The increasingly frequent ransomware attacks on American companies, particularly those with a connection to critical infrastructure, are a likely impetus behind the NCET's creation. In the summer of 2021 alone, ransomware attacks disrupted oil supplies, threatened a major metropolitan police department, and imperiled one of the world's largest beef suppliers, among others. Recently, Deputy AG Monaco remarked that ransomware threats carry national security implications, and the government is focused on holding not only the hackers accountable, but the money launderers and cryptocurrency companies that make ransomware profitable. Ransomware hackers frequently demand, and often receive, payment in cryptocurrency. While it is not illegal to pay ransom in connection with ransomware attacks, the FBI has specifically stated that it does not support such payments because it does not guarantee the organization's data will be returned, and it encourages perpetrators. Overall, the FBI's views, combined with other agency's guidance, suggests that if payments are necessary companies should report the incident to allow law enforcement to investigate and stop the attackers. It appears that the government is weighing in more frequently on this issue, likely due to the increase in ransomware attacks.
Even prior to the NCET's formation, the government had already begun to crack down on cryptocurrency exchange entities that engagement in misconduct directly, but also those that fail to implement adequate compliance measures. In August 2021, a convertible virtual currency derivatives exchange was assessed a $100 million civil monetary penalty by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) for violations of the Bank Secrecy Act based on its failure to implement an anti-money laundering and customer identification program, among other things. September 2021 saw the Treasury Department sanction a cryptocurrency exchange for facilitating financial transactions for ransomware actors. With the creation of the NCET, further prosecutions of this kind are likely.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
- 2What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 3Judge Blasts Authors' Lawyers in Key AI Suit, Says Case Doomed Without Upgraded Team
- 4Federal Judge Won't Stop Title IX Investigation Into Former GMU Law Professor
- 5Ex-Prosecutor and Judge Fatally Shot During Attempted Arrest on Federal Corruption Charges
Who Got The Work
Charles A. Weiss of Holland & Knight has entered an appearance for Rafael Badalov in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed July 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Lee Law on behalf of Otter Products LLC, accuses the defendant of selling counterfeit phone cases and accessories bearing the plaintiff's 'OtterBox' trademark. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nina R. Morrison, is 1:24-cv-05214, Otter Products, LLC v. Badalov et al.
Who Got The Work
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher partners Benjamin Hershkowitz, Richard W. Mark and Casey J. McCracken and R. Scott Johnson, Thomas M. Patton and Cara S. Donels have entered appearances for Berkshire Hathaway Energy Co. and MidAmerican Energy Co., respectively, in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 17 in Iowa Southern District Court by Nyemaster Goode PC and Caldwell Cassady & Curry on behalf of Midwest Energy Emissions Corp., asserts six patents related to sorbents for the oxidation and removal of mercury. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Stephen H. Locher, is 4:24-cv-00243, Midwest Energy Emissions Corp. v. Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company et al.
Who Got The Work
Michael J. Hickey and Michael L. Jente of Lewis Rice LLC have stepped in to represent Tidal Wave Management in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 18 in Missouri Western District Court by Husch Blackwell on behalf of Waterway Gas & Wash Co., accuses the defendant of using a mark that's confusingly similar to the plaintiff's 'Clean Car Club' mark. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Fernando J. Gaitan Jr., is 4:24-cv-00471, Waterway Gas & Wash Company v. Tidal Wave Management LLC.
Who Got The Work
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz partners Lauren M. Kofke and William Savitt have stepped in to represent CVS Health and and its top officials in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Chaya Sara Kaufmann, accuses the defendants of failing to disclose that they used misleading forecasts to set premium plans which overstated the profitability of the company's health care benefits segment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Margaret M. Garnett, is 1:24-cv-06595, Kaufmann v. Lynch et al.
Who Got The Work
Robert L. Wallan from Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman has entered an appearance for Findlay Management Group in a pending complaint for declaratory judgment. The complaint, filed on Aug. 8 in Nevada District Court by Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani and Skarzynski Marick & Black on behalf of Houston Casualty Co., seeks to declare that no insurance policy exists between Houston Casualty and Findlay due to there not being an adequate form of delivery and claims that if delivery was substantiated it is rescinded based on material omissions and misrepresentations. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gloria M. Navarro, is 2:24-cv-01459, Houston Casualty Company v. Findlay Management Group.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250