Corporate Litigation columnists Joseph M. McLaughlin and Shannon K. McGovern write: The Delaware Supreme Court recently clarified the limits of the stockholder ratification defense in litigation challenging director compensation awarded under the parameters of a stockholder-approved compensation plan.
By Joseph M. McLaughlin and Shannon K. McGovern|April 11, 2018 at 02:50 PM
X
Thank you for sharing!
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Joseph M. McLaughlin and Shannon K. McGovern
Investors, proxy advisory services and corporate governance watchdogs closely monitor executive compensation, and express their views on executive pay in diverse fora, ranging from advisory Say on Pay votes required under the Dodd-Frank Act to a CEO Salary Watchdog Facebook page. In the absence of stockholder approval, if a stockholder adequately alleges that directors breached their fiduciary duties by awarding themselves equity pursuant to an incentive plan, the directors must prove that the awards are entirely fair to the corporation. In litigation challenging compensation awarded by the board under an equity incentive plan that has been approved by a majority of informed and disinterested stockholders, however, the affirmative defense of stockholder ratification becomes relevant. Otherwise self-interested director compensation awards made within the confines of a fixed plan approved by fully informed stockholders may be subject to the deferential business judgment rule, not the entire fairness standard. The Delaware Supreme Court recently clarified the limits of the stockholder ratification defense in litigation challenging director compensation awarded under the parameters of a stockholder-approved compensation plan. In In re Inv’rs Bancorp Stockholder Litig., 177 A.3d 1208 (Del. 2017), the court recognized a business-judgment safe harbor for directors where the equity awards approved by stockholders are sufficiently specific as to amounts and terms. But when stockholders have approved an equity incentive plan that gives directors discretion to grant themselves awards within general parameters, and a stockholder adequately alleges that the directors inequitably exercised that discretion, a ratification defense is unavailable and the directors must prove the fairness of the awards to the corporation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
A weekly, curated selection of our international content from around the globe, across the business of law, in-house, regulatory, technology and more, with expert insights from our senior editors.
A familiar cast of characters, led by former Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, is set to return to Wilmington Thursday afternoon for a contempt hearing in a bitter billing dispute with the custodian appointed to oversee TransPerfect's forced sale in 2015.
In December, Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed a series of amendments that made significant changes to the requirements for statutory powers of attorney in the state of New York. The changes, as discussed by C. Raymond Radigan and David Milner in this edition of their Trusts and Estates Law column, are an effort on the part of the New York Legislature to address issues that had become problematic with the use of the existing statutory power of attorney.
A protective order cannot guarantee the abuse will stop and the victim and children will be safe. Nonetheless, it is a critical step to take because it helps to legally document the abusive experience.
With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
Dynamically explore and compare data on law firms, companies, individual lawyers, and industry trends.
Exclusive Depth and Reach.
Legal Compass includes access to our exclusive industry reports, combining the unmatched expertise of our analyst team with ALM’s deep bench of proprietary information to provide insights that can’t be found anywhere else.
Big Pictures and Fine Details
Legal Compass delivers you the full scope of information, from the rankings of the Am Law 200 and NLJ 500 to intricate details and comparisons of firms’ financials, staffing, clients, news and events.
Find out how B2B marketers in the legal, financial, insurance, and commercial real estate markets are using ABM to successfully drive leads and get business from key accounts.
In response to the ongoing pandemic, many federal agencies and state legislatures have revised their rules to allow for broader utilization of online solutions to remotely conduct business.
The Law Offices of CHOROWSKI & CLARY, P.A. is proud to announce that JAMIE M. EPSTEIN & MEGHANA M. SAOJI have been promoted to partners in the firm and MEGHAN M. CLARY has earned Board Certification in Marital and Family Law by the Florida Bar.
As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters.
Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss.
Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.