New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Law Journal Editorial Board | April 11, 2021
We agree it is essential for a court to assure the scientific reliability of DNA evidence and to permit defendant the right to contest its reliability in a meaningful way.
New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By Matheu D. Nunn and Matthew James Troiano | March 18, 2021
An overview of evidence issues and the accompanying rules that are frequently encountered in Family Part litigation, including real-world examples to reinforce that you must be able to navigate the rules; after all, your adversary may know them well.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Bari Weinberger | February 22, 2021
With digital evidence critical in so many family law proceedings, and with deepfake technology becoming easier for anyone to access, it's a given that this form of advanced digital trickery is something family law attorneys must be prepared to confront.
New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By Eric S. Poe | January 22, 2021
A plaintiff's passionate testimony is highly prejudicial in the eyes of a jury, yet has no probative value based on the instructions given to that jury. We need to eradicate this contradiction to ensure fairness in our judicial system.
New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By Jonathan N. Frodella | December 23, 2020
The New Jersey Open Public Records Act does not specifically address metadata, and our courts are only beginning to explore the various security, privacy and workflow issues that metadata presents.
By P.J. D'Annunzio | December 16, 2020
A man sent to prison for robbery successfully appealed his conviction, arguing that fingerprint evidence alone was not enough to prove that he committed the crime.
New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By Andrew M. Shaw | October 7, 2020
In custody and parenting time cases, it seems to be standard practice to require production of the parties' mental health records to expert witnesses. That general practice cannot stand.
New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By Louis Locascio | September 18, 2020
COURT WATCH: The issue, of first impression, was whether requiring a defendant to disclose the passcode of his cell phone violates his protection against self-incrimination provided by the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and New Jersey law.
By Suzette Parmley | August 11, 2020
"In a world where the right to privacy is constantly shrinking, the Constitution provides shelter to our innermost thoughts—the contents of our minds—from the prying eyes of the government." Justice Jaynee LaVecchia said in dissent.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Law Journal Editorial Board | July 12, 2020
We agree with the result, which is the same as if Armstrong had sent DeWitt threatening letters by old fashioned mail. The state could not intercept them in transit without a warrant, but the recipient could consent to turn them over.
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS