In a recent custody dispute in the UK, one of the parents involved presented the courts with an audio recording of the other parent making a series of dangerous and violent threats.

It was compelling evidence; the kind strong enough to sway a court’s decision. However, there was a problem: the recording wasn’t real. As the accused parent’s attorney would reveal through forensic analysis, the damning audio was actually a doctored “deepfake.” 

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]