By Erin Mulvaney | November 20, 2018
"Secretary Acosta's ratification orders merely rubber stamp some other official's determination that these ALJs should be appointed," Oracle's attorneys at Orrick contend. The case is a test of the scope of the Supreme Court's decision in Lucia v. SEC.
By Erin Mulvaney | November 20, 2018
“I had to make sure the jury understood what the EEOC was alleging, and what they were not alleging,” a defense lawyer for IXL Learning says.
By Erin Mulvaney | November 14, 2018
Lawyers for United, represented by a team from Seyfarth Shaw, contend in an EEOC lawsuit that the alleged conduct was "outside the course and scope" of the pilot's job at the airline and that the conduct was "not authorized or condoned by United."
By Erin Mulvaney | November 12, 2018
Lanetix Inc., a cloud services software company, was accused of pushing its coding engineers to stop discussing complaints about workplace conditions.
By Erin Mulvaney | November 9, 2018
The lawsuits claim the alleged hostile actions were part of a corporate culture in which black employees were consistently overlooked for advancement opportunities, and retaliated against when they complained.
By Erin Mulvaney | June 25, 2018
"Akima is not a governmental entity—it is a private company," the company's lawyers at Virginia-based IslerDare wrote in court papers asking a judge to dismiss the claims. "Therefore, Akima's termination of plaintiff's employment cannot possibly violate free speech clauses in the U.S. or Virginia Constitution."
By Erin Mulvaney | June 5, 2018
“Epic Systems ends any possible argument that the arbitration agreements should not be enforced,” Gibson Dunn's Theodore Boutrous tells the Ninth Circuit.
By Tony Mauro | May 24, 2018
Early criticism of Justice Neil Gorsuch's writing style seems to be waning, but don't get any ideas that he has changed to please the pundits.
By Marcia Coyle | May 22, 2018
Jenner & Block lawyers are calling "radical and profoundly troubling" a Texas federal judge's contempt order against three plaintiffs firms—Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, Outten & Golden, and Green Savits—for allegedly violating a nationwide injunction against the Obama-era U.S. Labor Department's overtime rule.
By Marcia Coyle | May 21, 2018
Neil Gorsuch's 25-page majority opinion and Ruth Bader Ginsburg's 30-page dissent offered conflicting views. Ginsburg's dissent also reflected the growing skepticism of the fairness of arbitration among her liberal colleagues on a court that for many years has been strongly pro-arbitration across the board. The clash marked the second time in months the two justices took aim at each other in writing.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS