The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Angela D. Giampolo | October 21, 2022
As we transition through this new America, it is imperative to shed light on the full breadth of Dobbs' impact and discuss the intersection of reproductive and LGBTQ+ rights that have been impacted.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Benjamin Geffen and Claudia De Palma | October 14, 2022
A major case from North Carolina now before the U.S. Supreme Court has grave implications for voting rights in Pennsylvania and nationwide. Moore v. Harper, Case No. 21-1271, asks the court to jettison over a century of precedent by adopting the "independent state legislature" theory.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Stephen A. Miller | October 5, 2022
The court returns this month to a new docket of cases. Most of the popular attention will focus on high-profile questions of constitutional law, but the justices will decide interesting questions in several other areas of law.
By Marcia Coyle | October 3, 2022
New U.S. Supreme Court justices generally take one of two approaches to their first oral argument: a cautious question or two, or full-throated participation in the quick back and forth between justices and advocates. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson took the second during two arguments Monday.
By Brad Kutner | October 3, 2022
The My Pillow CEO argued in the now dismissed petition, "to this day Lindell continues to declare that his criticism [of Dominion Voting Systems] is true."
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Sydney Smith Forquer and Ashling A. Ehrhardt | September 27, 2022
On Oct. 31, the court will hear two cases challenging affirmative action in university admissions: Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina, notably brought by the same anti-affirmative action group, Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA).
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Penny Conly Ellison | September 9, 2022
On Oct. 11, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in the case of National Pork Producers Council v. Ross, a case that will likely determine the power of states to impose minimum animal welfare standards for animal products sold in their state.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Vasilios J. (Bill) Kalogredis | August 29, 2022
In a unanimous opinion delivered by Justice Brett Kavanaugh on June 15, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with hospitals and held that Medicaid funding was unlawfully cut to certain hospital groups. In the American Hospital Association v. Becerra holding, the Supreme Court has made it clear that the cuts in 2018 and 2019 to only one group of hospitals is contrary to the associated reimbursement statute and unlawful.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Luis Miguel Meléndez | August 11, 2022
The court has made clear that when religious faith, especially that of Christians, conflicts with other constitutional rights, religion prevails.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Larry E. Coben | August 5, 2022
In Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway, 266 A. 3d 542 (2021), the court ruled that courts cannot hear an out-of-state claim in Pennsylvania based upon the foreign corporation's registration to do business because registration was coerced by statute rather than a voluntary agreement to subject itself to the general jurisdiction of our courts.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS