0 results for 'U.S. Department of Labor'
'A Win for Employees and Employers': How the 'JOBS' Program Helps Probationers Find Work
"It is an opportunity to take part in a transformational approach to rehabilitation that seeks to break the cycle," writes retired Superior Court Judge Mark Sandson.
Appellate Division, Second Department: May 3, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-05-03 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Handdown List released on:May 1, 2024
On The Move: Seyfarth Grows Corporate Group With BCLP Laterals
Meanwhile, Nelson Mullins has bolstered its litigation practice with new partners in D.C. and Charlotte, and a former Kilpatrick associate has rejoined from a GC position.
People in the News—May 2, 2024—Stradley Ronon, Offit Kurman
The Main Line Chamber of Commerce is scheduled to hold the Greater Philadelphia Summit on Business Impact and Volunteerism from 8:15 to 10:30 a.m. on Thursday at the Hilton Philadelphia City Avenue; Michael O'Mara, managing partner at Stradley Ronon Stevens and Young, is set to deliver remarks.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Constangy’s Field Guide to the Fair Labor Standards Act 2014
Authors: Michael D. Malfitano
View this Book
View more book results for the query "U.S. Department of Labor"
Appellate Division, First Department: May 2, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-05-02 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appeals & Motions List released on:April 30, 2024
Justices Will Eye Reach of Civil RICO Law in Medical Marijuana Case
The petitioners—Medical Marijuana Inc., Dixie Holdings LLC and the two companies' joint venture that launched Dixie X—argue that RICO does not allow plaintiffs to bring claims for civil damages stemming from a personal injury.
What a Recent Labor Law §240(1) Decision Teaches Us About Stare Decisis
This article examines the recent Court of Appeals decision that addresses whether the plaintiff was engaged in the type of "repairing" activity that is covered by Labor Law §240(1). The case should be of interest to practitioners for the implications of the specific holding. However, it also provides a broader lesson on stare decisis.
Appellate Division, First Department: April 29, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-04-29 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appeals & Motions List released on:April 25, 2024
Republican States Sue EEOC Over PWFA Rule's Abortion Accommodation Mandate
"Congress passed the bipartisan Pregnant Workers Fairness Act to protect mothers-to-be and promote healthy pregnancies, and the EEOC's attempt to rewrite that law into an abortion mandate is illegal," Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti said.TRENDING STORIES
More from ALM
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Carolyn Burbrink, Uber Director of Volume Mobility Safety and Insurance Litigation 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Vaishali Rao, Hinshaw & Culbertson Partner 1 minute read
Resources
Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now