Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Swartz Campbell'

You can use to get even better search results
November 23, 2009 |

Total Attorneys Worldwide

11 minute read
August 30, 1999 |

Pa. Can't Decide on a Name for Bad Faith

When it comes to insurance, especially issues of bad faith, timing is of the essence. And when it comes to confusing legal issues, such as sorting out the specifics involving timing, the courts are responsible for clearing the confusion. But when the courts can't reach a consensus, the lawyers are often left with a crapshoot in the courtroom. Such has been the case with the issue surrounding the statute of limitations for Pennsylvania's bad faith statute.
7 minute read
May 03, 2000 |

The Ever-Changing World of Lateral Hires

7 minute read
December 03, 2003 |

Superior Court Upholds Bad Faith Findings

The Superior Court ruled Monday that an insurance company twice acted in bad faith in its handling of one claim - the second instance being when it attempted to settle an underinsured motorist benefits claim with a requirement that the insured drop his potential bad-faith claim against the company.
6 minute read
June 14, 1999 |

Confederate General's Descendant Wins $800K in Suit Against Yankee

A federal jury on Friday awarded $800,000 to Maj. Gen. George E. Pickett's great-great grandson, who said he was swindled into selling his famous ancestor's artifacts for just a fraction of their worth. The jury found that George E. Pickett V, of Wilmington, N.C., was defrauded by Russ Pritchard III and his Bryn Mawr company, the American Ordnance Preservation Association.
4 minute read
May 24, 1999 |

Supreme Court Changes Its Mind in Asbestos Case

After granting allocatur in January in order to determine what kind of proof of exposure asbestos plaintiffs need in order to win their personal injury suits against companies, the high court has decided not to hear the case. The state Supreme Court dismissed the appeal. The trial judge issued an opinion saying that asbestos plaintiffs still have to show their injuries were caused by "regular, frequent, and proximate" exposure to a defendant's product.
7 minute read
February 28, 2000 |

Court Decisions

24 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now