After granting allocatur in January in order to determine what kind of proof of exposure asbestos plaintiffs need in order to win their personal injury suits against companies, the high court has decided not to hear the case. The state Supreme Court dismissed the appeal. The trial judge issued an opinion saying that asbestos plaintiffs still have to show their injuries were caused by "regular, frequent, and proximate" exposure to a defendant's product.
May 24, 1999 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
After granting allocatur in January in order to determine what kind ofproof of exposure asbestos plaintiffs need in order to win theirpersonal injury suits against companies, the high court has decided notto hear the case.
The state Supreme Court dismissed the appeal “as having beenimprovidently granted,” in its per curiam order filed May 19.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
