0 results for 'Swartz Campbell'
Pa. Can't Decide on a Name for Bad Faith
When it comes to insurance, especially issues of bad faith, timing is of the essence. And when it comes to confusing legal issues, such as sorting out the specifics involving timing, the courts are responsible for clearing the confusion. But when the courts can't reach a consensus, the lawyers are often left with a crapshoot in the courtroom. Such has been the case with the issue surrounding the statute of limitations for Pennsylvania's bad faith statute.Superior Court Upholds Bad Faith Findings
The Superior Court ruled Monday that an insurance company twice acted in bad faith in its handling of one claim - the second instance being when it attempted to settle an underinsured motorist benefits claim with a requirement that the insured drop his potential bad-faith claim against the company.Confederate General's Descendant Wins $800K in Suit Against Yankee
A federal jury on Friday awarded $800,000 to Maj. Gen. George E. Pickett's great-great grandson, who said he was swindled into selling his famous ancestor's artifacts for just a fraction of their worth. The jury found that George E. Pickett V, of Wilmington, N.C., was defrauded by Russ Pritchard III and his Bryn Mawr company, the American Ordnance Preservation Association.Supreme Court Changes Its Mind in Asbestos Case
After granting allocatur in January in order to determine what kind of proof of exposure asbestos plaintiffs need in order to win their personal injury suits against companies, the high court has decided not to hear the case. The state Supreme Court dismissed the appeal. The trial judge issued an opinion saying that asbestos plaintiffs still have to show their injuries were caused by "regular, frequent, and proximate" exposure to a defendant's product.
Suzanne Miller v. John McClure
Publication Date: 1999-12-22 Practice Area: harassment
Industry: Court: Supreme Court Of New Jersey Judge: CHIEF JUSTICE PORITZ and JUSTICES O'HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, and VERNIERO Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gregory D. Saputelli for Appellant For defendant: Wendy L. Mager for respondent Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company, Robert M. Smolen for respondent Huron Insurance Company, and Michael J. Marone for respondent New Jersey Re Insurance Company Case number: A- 60 September Term 1998
The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. PER CURIAM The issue in this appeal is whether certain policies of insurance provide coverage for
Trending Stories
- 1Joshua Wright's $108M Defamation Case Against Former Students to Proceed to Trial
- 2AI: Looking at Its Impact on the Legal Profession in 2025 and Beyond
- 3AI/IP Issues Part 2: What Current Litigation Can Tell Us About Where IP in AI Is Heading
- 4AI/IP Issues Part 1: State of the Law and Anticipating Issues Including Licensing Concerns
- 5Biden Picks Nominees for US District Judgeships in Pennsylvania, California and Minnesota
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now