Search Results

0 results for 'Oracle'

You can use to get even better search results
Total Energies EP USA v. MP Gulf of Mexico
Publication Date: 2023-06-26
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Contractual Disputes | Dispute Resolution
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Boyd
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 21-0028

Respondent MP Gulf of Mexico, as two-thirds owner of some oil and gas leases called Chinook Unit made two contracts with petitioner Total Energies E&P USA, Inc. as one-third owner of the same unit.

June 22, 2023 | Legaltech News

Preparing for Data Subject Access Requests: Navigating Downstream Effects of Layoffs and CPRA Modifications

Businesses and their legal departments alike are at risk of being overwhelmed by DSARs, and by the amount of data they will need to locate and review to fulfill them. Now is the time for businesses to take appropriate steps to prepare for the deluge.
6 minute read
June 20, 2023 | Law.com

All Is Not Fair In Love and Warhol

A new balance must be struck between the new use and the exclusive right of authors to make derivative works, and part of that balance includes a clearer focus on the statutory fair use factors as well as the commercial nature or not of the new work. As a practical matter, how much the decision changes in this "troublesome" area remains to be seen.
9 minute read
Pearson Educ., Inc. v. Chegg, Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-06-16
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for New Jersey
Judge: District Judge Linares
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 21-16866

Defendant applied to compel plaintiff to produce documents in a copyright infringement action.

June 15, 2023 | Corporate Counsel

AI Startup Taps DoorDash Privacy Lead as CLO

"As the market matures, security, compliance and privacy will become a top priority for companies looking to leverage AI solutions. It's important that AI firms, like Inbenta, take steps now to differentiate themselves in this area," Inbenta CLO Adam Rivera said of his new role.
2 minute read
June 02, 2023 | Law.com

Future of Litigation: Staying Ahead in a Changing Legal Landscape

Join the highly anticipated, annual Future of Litigation webcast to hear our expert panel discuss the latest trends shaping the litigation landscape.
4 minute read
June 02, 2023 | Legaltech News

Legal Tech Rundown: ACEDS, Redgrave Education Partnership, Multiple New Hires, and More

An update on the legal tech market's past few weeks, from product launches to new partnerships.
6 minute read
June 01, 2023 | Corporate Counsel

Inside Track: Is Providing Personal Security to the CEO Savvy Risk Management or Ego-Stroking?

"Is the security being offered designed to protect or being designed to aggrandize? That is an important distinction," corporate governance expert Charles Elson said.
5 minute read
June 01, 2023 | Law.com

Inside Track: Is Providing Personal Security to the CEO Savvy Risk Management or Ego-Stroking?

"Is the security being offered designed to protect or being designed to aggrandize? That is an important distinction," corporate governance expert Charles Elson said.
5 minute read
In re Oracle Corp. Derivative Litig.
Publication Date: 2023-05-30
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Software
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Joel Friedlander, Jeffrey M. Gorris, David Hahn, Friedlander & Gorris, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Randall J. Baron, David A. Knotts, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, CA; Christopher H. Lyons, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Nashville, TN; Gregory Del Gaizo, Robbins LLP, San Diego, CA for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Blake Rohrbacher, Susan M. Hannigan, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Elena C. Norman, Richard J. Thomas, Alberto E. Chávez, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Peter A. Wald, Latham & Watkins LLP, San Francisco, CA; Blair Connelly, Latham & Watkins LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
Case number: 2017-0337-SG

Corporate founder who retained a quarter stake of the company and served as a director and officer did not attempt to use his influence to drive acquisition of another company in which he also held an interest, such that the board's appointment of a special committee to negotiate the acquisition meant that the transaction did not need to be reviewed under entire fairness.

Resources