In proceedings in the estate of "Tex", interlocutory appeals were taken on issues regarding whether appellants' alleged fraudulent inducement of Tex, Tex's lack of mental capacity, or Tex being unduly influenced by appellants to execute certain documents should be decided by the trial court or by arbitration.

Motion to Dismiss Granted in Part as Plaintiff Had Not Relation to Debt or Debtor

In ongoing litigation among multiple parties involving multiple claims concerning the Moncrief family trusts and business entities, appellees filed a counterclaim against appellants disputing the validity of the fifth amendment to the Moncrief Family Partnership, L.P., arguing the signatory to the amendment lacked mental capacity or was unduly influenced.

New York v. Joshua A. Mencel

A real estate development company, that alleged that the court erred in denying its motion to intervene, failed to prove on appeal how it was entitled to relief.