0 results for 'null'
What Does 'Subtantial Basis' Mean Under NY's Anti-Slapp Statute?
This article is based on the recent First Department decision, "Reeves v. Associated Newspapers, Ltd." which presents the issue of what constitutes a "substantial basis in law" under the anti-SLAPP law to warrant mandatory costs and attorneys' fees to SLAPP defendant.
Easy Peasy: Federal Circuit Affirms Finding of Unclean Hands, Bars Patent Recovery
In this article, Rob Maier discusses 'Luv n' Care v. Laurain and Eazy-PZ' and highlights how the case is a helpful reminder that the unclean hands doctrine is alive and well in the patent disputes context, and can be a powerful tool in an accused infringer's defense arsenal.
Midmarket Roundup: Northeast Firms Seize Opportunities in Florida and California
Sills Cummis & Gross follows in a long line of Northeast firms opening in Florida; Philadelphia sees an influx of midsize law firm entrants; attorneys defending a U.K. tailor couldn't resist sewing-related wordplay following an appellate win; and a Shipman & Goodwin partner will moderate Yale's innovation summit.
Court Rejects Prophylactic Use of Affirmative Defenses, Sanctions Defendant
The ruling serves as a reminder to legal practitioners that pleadings should not be used as a testing ground for defenses but rather as a platform for assertions grounded in existing evidence and legal principles.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Rules 2024
Authors:
View this Book
View more book results for the query "*"
Swelling Workloads Taking Toll on In-House Lawyers' Mental Health
"The more camaraderie that's on the team, the less stress, the less burnout and the higher the retention rates," said former in-house lawyer Shai Mehani, co-founder of the networking group In-house Connect.
Latham and Arnold & Porter Build Health Care Regulatory Teams
A conflict at Paul Hastings contributed to Eva Temkin's move to Arnold & Porter, while Latham has lured two partners from Skadden.
Sidebar Series: The Trump Jury Instructions
To find Trump guilty of the charged felonies, the jury must find that the prosecution has proven, beyond a reasonable doubt, the elements of those crimes—that he caused his company's business records to be falsified with the intent to commit or conceal another crime, specifically that he conspired to influence the 2016 presidential election by unlawful means.
TRENDING STORIES
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read