New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By Donna Fisher, Matthew Hamilton and Sandra Adams | April 12, 2018
A look at "Winfield v. City of New York" in view of three significant TAR cases authored by S.D.N.Y. Magistrate Judge Peck, and other illustrative cases, as well as suggestions for best practices.
New Jersey Law Journal | Expert Opinion
By Bruce Gerstman | April 10, 2018
A number of investigative techniques can bring even the most ingeniously opaque arrangements into the light.
New Jersey Law Journal | Analysis
By Thomas Cotton | April 5, 2018
This article discusses two circumstances in which a litigation cyborg can hold an advantage over a human lawyer when arguing discovery's scope.
New Jersey Law Journal | Commentary
By Law Journal Editorial Board | April 2, 2018
We can see no issue of expert admissibility that could be raised on a motion in limine that could not be raised equally well on a motion for summary judgment. The only difference is one of timing. However, counsel need to be aware.
By Amanda Bronstad | March 7, 2018
U.S. District Judge Dan Polster in Cleveland told lawyers in the multidistrict litigation to come up with a plan by March 16 over the scope and timing of a “litigation track.”
By Marc H. Zitomer | January 8, 2018
It is widely recognized that a poorly conducted investigation is as detrimental to an employer and the victim as having conducted no investigation at all.
By Michael Booth | December 28, 2017
Both plaintiff and defense counsel want to ensure that any future cases end up in Bergen County with the 47 others now pending.
By Michael Booth | December 15, 2017
A decision by the New Jersey Supreme Court requires judiciary administrators to begin notifying parties litigating professional malpractice claims of their statutory obligations to file affidavits of merit and to schedule hearings to determine whether those affidavits are satisfactory.
By Lawrence R. Jones | November 13, 2017
Don't damage the mutual courtesy and good will that is so important to potentially reaching a settlement, by heaping upon the opposing party an overbearingly voluminous pile of materials right before the conference.
By Charles Toutant | September 22, 2017
The judge in a suit over alleged destruction of asbestos-related evidence by BASF Corp. and law firm Cahill, Gordon & Reindel has rejected claims that Roberto Rivera-Soto has a conflict of interest that should prevent him from serving as discovery special master.
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS