By Sue Reisinger | February 27, 2020
"Plaintiffs' arguments boil down to nothing more than an objection to McDonald's existence as a large corporation with complex legal needs," McDonald's lawyer argues.
By Charles Toutant | February 21, 2020
Antitrust claims are a product of federal statute and thus are extrinsic to, and not rights "under," a commercial agreement, the appeals court said.
By Charles Toutant | December 27, 2019
New Jersey was at the forefront of a legal and public policy battle over mandatory arbitration of employment and consumer contracts in 2019. And 2020 promises more conflict as pro-arbitration interests and those opposing mandatory arbitration battle in state and federal courts.
Connecticut Law Tribune | Investigation
By Robert Storace | October 22, 2019
With 31 states announcing Tuesday they'd be joining an antitrust probe into social media giant Facebook, 47 states are now officially on board in saying they'd take part in the investigation.
By Charles Toutant | October 4, 2019
The settlement, which was approved by U.S. District Judge Claire Cecchi on Thursday, also calls for the syndicates to enact a series of reforms to their business model over a five-year period.
By Scott Graham | September 18, 2019
Generic challenger Akorn Inc. failed to recover attorney fees when invalidating Allergan's eyelash enhancer patents, therefore, those cases cannot be considered "sham" proceedings that give rise to monopolization claims, Judge Brian Martinotti rules.
By Charles Toutant | July 25, 2019
The drugmaker was accused of antitrust violations for allegedly interfering with development of generic versions of two of its drugs.
By Robert Storace | June 25, 2019
A newly unredacted complaint gives a fuller picture of allegations that several Big Pharma companies conspired to fix prices. Here are some of the key takeaways in the lawsuit, lodged by 44 states.
The Legal Intelligencer | Commentary
By Carl W. Hittinger and Tyson Y. Herrold | May 31, 2019
Judge Dolores K. Sloviter of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit retired in 2016, leaving behind a remarkable legacy. As a member of the bench for nearly 40 years, Sloviter's contribution to the Third Circuit's jurisprudence bridges the expanse of the court's jurisdiction.
By Charles Toutant | April 2, 2019
The lawsuits claim the no-poach rule is "a naked restraint of competition and a per se violation of the antitrust laws."
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS