Because Walters' employment and termination took place in Connecticut, "it would require rare circumstances to rebut the presumption that Connecticut substantive law applies. And this is not one of those rare situations," Third Circuit Judge Peter Phipps found.
October 28, 2022 at 02:28 PM
4 minute read
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld the firing of a Connecticut man who sued his employer for retaliatory discharge in New Jersey.
New Jersey’s choice-of-law rules require that, under the circumstances, the substantive law of Connecticut should be applied to Nicholas Walters’ suit against Safelite Fulfillment, the auto glass repair company, the appeals court said.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Safelite Auto Glass in Midway, Florida. Photo: Michael Rivera via Wikimedia Commons
