By Tom McParland | April 28, 2020
The decision, from a three-judge panel of the Manhattan-based appeals court, wiped out a 2017 verdict by a federal jury in the Northern District of New York.
By Leigh Jones | Vanessa Blum | April 17, 2020
Randy Mastro, co-chair of the firm's litigation practice group, describes the growing wave of lawsuits.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Justin T. Green and Steven R. Pounian | April 17, 2020
In their Aviation Law column, Justin T. Green and Steven R. Pounian discuss a Supreme Court's decision not to accept certiorari, which leaves in place a sensible Third Circuit holding that providing immunity for allegedly defective products to aviation manufacturers was inconstant with Congress's goal in passing the FAAct, which was to promote aviation safety.
By Amanda Bronstad | April 15, 2020
MDLs, Sixth Circuit Judge Raymond Kethledge wrote, "are not some kind of judicial border country, where the rules are few and the law rarely makes an appearance."
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Max Mitchell | April 3, 2020
According to Jason Zweig of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, the science linking Zantac and the carcinogenic molecule has been clear, so even without the FDA's recent move, causation would be solid.
By Keelin Kavanagh and Chris Gismondi | April 3, 2020
The industry should anticipate more lawsuits and investigations from attorneys general and local municipalities.
By Jack Newsham | February 26, 2020
In another setback for the Cellino & Barnes dissolution, attorney Ellen Sturm claims Ross Cellino has refused to approve a nearly $1 million payment to her.
By Milton Springut | February 7, 2020
Surprisingly, there are few cases that have considered liability of retailers who sell products with (allegedly) false or misleading labels under the Lanham Act, or who engage in other promotional acts related to third-party products. Recently, however, two cases have addressed these issues in the context of both brick-and-mortar and online retail outlets.
By Amanda Bronstad | February 4, 2020
A judge in a New York talc case found that Simmons Hanly Conroy's disclosure of Johnson & Johnson CEO Alex Gorsky's deposition to Reuters "was frivolous and done to harass the defendants," and ordered a Feb. 24 hearing before a special master to determine monetary sanctions.
By Meredith Hobbs | February 3, 2020
The four partners from Orrick share clients including Johnson & Johnson and Dow with King & Spalding.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
We are seeking an associate to join our Employee Benefits practice. Candidates should have three to six years of employee benefits experienc...
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Duane Morris LLP has an immediate opening for a senior level, highly motivated litigation associate to join its dynamic and growing Employme...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS