By Ellen Bardash | April 13, 2021
Defense lawyers said the case was one of products liability while counsel for tribal governments said they were stating a claim for negligence and public nuisance in holding JUUL responsible for health impacts on young people.
By Marcia Coyle | March 25, 2021
"Ford has a veritable truckload of contacts with Montana and Minnesota, as it admits," Justice Elena Kagan wrote in Thursday's ruling.
By Dylan Jackson | January 19, 2021
"They come from a very deep science background, and that's what we really focus on," firm chair Madeleine McDonough said.
By Regina Calcaterra, Janine Pollack and Anjori Mitra | December 11, 2020
Because of §6(b), consumers continue to be exposed to dangerous goods, even after the danger is known to the Consumer Products Safety Commission.
By Tom McParland | November 20, 2020
Jerome Block, a partner with Levy Konigsberg who represented the plaintiffs at trial, said Friday his clients were satisfied with the outcome and "look forward to moving this case toward completion." The adjustment took down the ratio of punitive damages to compensatory damages.
By Amanda Bronstad | November 6, 2020
Hurricanes delayed the New Orleans trial, which featured masks, social distancing and plexiglass shields to prevent COVID-19. The case was among the first held in person since the pandemic shut courthouse doors in March.
By Amanda Bronstad | November 5, 2020
The proposal, which still has to be approved by thousands of cities and counties, may have overcome a major hurdle in the negotiations for a global opioid settlement: legal fees. The deal involves three major pharmaceutical distributors and Johnson & Johnson.
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Max Mitchell | September 29, 2020
A unanimous three-judge panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court on Monday said the federal law, which all but eliminates liability claims for the gun industry, violates principles of federalism.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Michael Hoenig | August 7, 2020
In an attempt to alert readers who might have missed them, this article briefly reports about two Appellate Division decisions dealing with expert testimony and other issues, Michael Hoenig writes in his Complex Litigation column.
By Amanda Bronstad | June 10, 2020
Judges in dozens of rulings in multidistrict litigation have failed to follow Rule 702 in allowing expert testimony into trials that should not have been admissible, wrote three defense lawyers in a Tuesday letter to the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules, which is reviewing possible amendments.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
We are seeking an associate to join our Employee Benefits practice. Candidates should have three to six years of employee benefits experienc...
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Duane Morris LLP has an immediate opening for a senior level, highly motivated litigation associate to join its dynamic and growing Employme...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS