NYC Public Defenders, Not Assigned Counsel, to Get First Call in Homicide Cases
Currently homicide cases are first sent to 18-B attorneys and defender organizations such as the Legal Aid Society were brought in when conflicts arise.
December 17, 2018 at 10:00 AM
5 minute read
Starting next year, New York City public defender organizations will get priority over homicide cases against low-income defendants, a shift from a system in which homicide work was mostly sent to veteran defense attorneys working on assigned counsel, or 18-B, panels.
Currently homicide cases are first sent to 18-B attorneys and defender organizations such as the Legal Aid Society were brought in when conflicts arise. After years of talks, that model is set to be reversed.
To prepare for the change, Legal Aid, the city's largest provider of indigent legal services, has formed the Homicide Defense Task Force; Legal Aid and its counterparts throughout the city begin taking cases under the new model on Jan. 1.
The New York City government, which allocates about $290 million annually for indigent defense, expanded its contracts with public defender organizations to include homicide cases “because these organizations have strong institutional capacity,” said Patrick Gallahue, a spokesman for the Mayor's Office of Criminal Justice.
“New Yorkers will continue to receive effective representation,” Gallahue said.
Legal Aid, for example, can offer in-house resources such as mitigation specialists and units specializing in DNA and forensics, said Jamal Johnson, who will head up Legal Aid's task force.
Alice Fontier, managing director of The Bronx Defenders, said her organization is bringing on at least three additional attorneys, a social worker, an investigator and a paralegal to handle the influx of new cases.
The Bronx sees an average of about 100 homicide cases annually. Fontier's said that defense providers such as The Bronx Defenders can bring more resources to the table to represent indigent defendants facing murder charges than many 18-B attorneys, who are often solo attorneys.
“There are some excellent 18-B attorneys and there are some people who aren't as committed to handling their clients as they should be,” Fontier said.
While priority on which attorneys represent defendants in murder cases is shifting, 18-B lawyers are not being removed from the picture entirely; they'll still get called in on cases with three or more defendants.
Another scenario where murder cases get sent to assigned counsel may be presented because of the size of institutional providers such as Legal Aid, said Michael Alperstein, the administrator for the 18-B plan for the First Department, which includes Manhattan and the Bronx.
For example, a Legal Aid attorney representing a defendant in a homicide case may not learn until close to trial that a witness in the case was also previously represented by Legal Aid, and thus an 18-B attorney may come in to break up the conflict.
“I don't think it's going to eliminate the 18-B plan because we're going to still get conflict cases,” Alperstein said. “There are a high percentage of homicides with defendants finding conflicts and requiring newly assigned lawyers.”
The change comes as crime rates across the city continue a downward tumble.
According to the New York City Police Department, the department investigated 290 total murders in 2017, and, as of the end of November, it investigated 266 this year.
Most homicide cases involve defendants of limited means, thus even defendants in high-profile cases, such as Pedro Hernandez, who was convicted of kidnapping and killing Etan Patz; and Yoselyn Ortega, a nanny convicted earlier this year of killing two children in her care in their Upper West Side apartment, were represented by 18-B attorneys.
18-B attorneys are paid $75 per hour to handle felonies, a rate that has not changed since 2004. Under the terms of their contracts with the city, indigent defense providers are allocated funds based on the volume of cases they handle.
Years ago, the city's authority to shift cases from assigned counsel to institutional providers was the subject of a legal battle between the Bloomberg administration and city bar groups.
In 2012, the Court of Appeals issued a 4-3 ruling finding that the city is allowed to implement a combination model of providing indigent defense using both institutional providers and assigned counsel.
There are also differences between 18-B and institutional providers over representing low-income parents facing abuse and neglect proceedings.
At a recent hearing before a blue-ribbon panel formed to discuss parental representation in New York, representatives from Brooklyn Defender Services touted data showing that cases with representation from institutional providers tend to result in children getting sent to foster care less often and for shorter periods of time than when 18-B attorneys work the cases.
Read more:
NY Family Court Attorneys: Better Pay, Case Caps Will Improve Low-Income Representation
NYC Legal Aid Society Says City Should Provide More Funding for Pay Raises
Indigent Representation: Post-Conviction Best Practices
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBankruptcy Judge Clears Path for Recovery in High-Profile Crypto Failure
3 minute readUS Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Brought Under NYC Gender Violence Law, Ruling Claims Barred Under State Measure
In Resolved Lawsuit, Jim Walden Alleged 'Retaliatory' Silencing by X of His Personal Social Media Account
'Where Were the Lawyers?' Judge Blocks Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Energy Lawyers Field Client Questions as Trump Issues Executive Orders on Industry Funding, Oversight
- 2SEC Revokes Biden-Era Crypto Accounting Guidance
- 3CNN's $16M Settlement With Trump Sets Bad Precedent in Uncertain Times
- 4Regulating Charities: A Small Suggestion
- 5Attorney Emerges as Possible Owner of Historic Miami Courthouse Amid Delays of New Building
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250