The Legal Intelligencer | News
By Zack Needles | November 7, 2019
Halloween was a scary day for DUI defense lawyers.
By Jane Wester | November 7, 2019
Exxon attorney Ted Wells, a partner at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, was quick to criticize the late concession on fraud charges, and described the remaining contested issue under the Martin Act as trivial.
The American Lawyer | Analysis|News
By David Thomas | November 7, 2019
The geography may stand out, but the business pressures driving a flurry of midwest mergers are familiar to law firms everywhere.
Connecticut Law Tribune | Event|News
By Robert Storace | November 7, 2019
The U.S. Senate voted 86-2 Thursday afternoon to confirm Connecticut federal prosecutor William Nardini to a judgeship on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
By Dan M. Clark | November 7, 2019
It's the latest development in the litigation, brought by the New York attorney general, which resulted last year in an expedited timeline for the Trump Foundation being dissolved.
By Dan Clark | November 7, 2019
Like any other industry, cannabis needs capital to expand as more countries are looking at ways to regulate the plant and its products. For the general counsel at firms that invest only in cannabis companies, keeping up with that regulation is a large part of the job.
By Brenda Sapino Jeffreys | November 7, 2019
The Virginia-based National Security Technology Accelerator alleges that a Jackson Walker lawyer failed to mention she was also working for the organization on the other side of the vendor contract.
Connecticut Law Tribune | News
By Tom McParland | November 7, 2019
The Appellate Division, First Department held that Caplan's offense qualified as a "serious crime" that warranted immediate suspension, but also granted his request for a hearing as to "why a final order of censure, suspension or disbarment should not be made."
By Tom McParland | November 7, 2019
The Appellate Division, First Department held that Caplan's offense qualified as a "serious crime" that warranted immediate suspension, but also granted his request for a hearing as to "why a final order of censure, suspension or disbarment should not be made."
The Legal Intelligencer | News
By P.J. D'Annunzio | November 7, 2019
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled that the law does not give the public or members of the media the right to inspect warrants related to ongoing grand jury investigations.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
Job Opportunity: Location: Prestigious Florida Law Firm seeks to hire a Business attorney with at least 5 years of experience for their Ft. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS