The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on Thursday barred an amicus brief on behalf of more than 100 companies in a closely watched Trump administration immigration case, after concluding the filing would have caused one of the court’s 15 judges to sit on the sidelines for an upcoming hearing.

The law firm McDermott Will & Emery had filed the brief earlier this year on behalf of 104 businesses and organizations that were backing a challenge to the Trump administration’s “public charge” rule. The administration’s new definition of a “public charge”—a person who receives 12 months of benefits in a three-year window—would hinder admissibility of certain immigrants, critics assert.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]