If patent infringement cases aren't "exceptional," they're precluded from being “shams” for antitrust purposes, according to an order from U.S. District Judge Brian Martinotti of New Jersey in Duke University v. Akorn.
September 17, 2019 at 07:00 AM
1 minute read
Welcome to Skilled in the Art. I’m Law.com IP reporter Scott Graham. Here’s what’s cooking today:
• If patent infringement cases aren’t “exceptional,” they’re precluded from being “shams” for antitrust purposes.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
