By Isha Marathe | December 4, 2023
The Federal Trade Commission submitted a comment to the U.S. Copyright Office voicing its intention to investigate the copyright practices of AI developers who they believe are engaging in unfair competition—whether the companies infringed copyright or not.
By Tal S. Benschar | December 4, 2023
A recent decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board contains several important principles to evaluate abandonment claims.
By Mary Grieco and Andrew Lustigman | December 1, 2023
President Biden passed an executive order on October 30 that creates new standards, safety, and security in AI systems. The new standards are meant to protect consumers from data breaches in AI systems and scammers using AI to take advantage of people. This artcle discusses what companies and consumers need to know about the new order.
By Ellen Bardash | November 30, 2023
Arnold, who has offices in Sacramento and Woodland Hills, California, claims to have owned the federal service mark "JUSTICE4YOU" since at least 2007 and spent nearly $5.5 million on marketing that used the mark since 2010.
By ALM Staff | November 20, 2023
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
By ALM Staff | November 13, 2023
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
By Allison Dunn | November 9, 2023
"Plaintiff is therefore forced to resort to an argument that Defendant's facilities—located on the opposite coast—infringe on its trademarks. This sort of significant geographic separation between local businesses, coupled with the lack of any legally cognizable consumer overlap, compels application of the principles espoused in Dawn Donut, What-A-Burger, and their progeny. Plaintiff makes many arguments to the contrary, but they are all unavailing," Young wrote.
By ALM Staff | November 8, 2023
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
By Riley Brennan | November 7, 2023
"While Sabra is not through its display of KVH's Mark advertising that its products were manufactured by KVH, the nature of the Mark that KVH bestows upon products is such that the Mark itself conveys information about the products' origin regarding the production processes that must adhere to strict kosher guidelines, which is certified by KVH. Accordingly, the likelihood of confusion regarding the products' origin is high," U.S. District Judge Angel Kelley of the District of Massachusetts concluded.
By Riley Brennan | November 3, 2023
This complaint was first surfaced by Law.com Radar.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Health Law Associate CT Shipman is seeking an associate to join our national longstanding health law practice. Candidates must have t...
Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking two associates to expand our national commercial real estate lending practice. Candidates should have ...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS