Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Publication Date: 2018-01-09 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Bowes Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 17-1902
Trial courts removal of pro se defendant and conducting of a trial in absentia constituted non-frivolous appellate issue due to the denial of any representation of defendants interests at trial. Counsels motion to withdraw denied.
Evidence that defendant fired a gun at a vital organ of the victim was sufficient evidence for the jury to infer defendants intent to kill and malice for first-degree murder and aggravated assault convictions. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
The court did not abuse its discretion in this mortgage foreclosure matter by refusing to set aside a sheriffs sale where neither defendant nor his attorney appeared at the emergency hearing.
District courts lack of fact-finding and determination factors required vacatur of injunction imposing county-based signature requirements upon minor party candidates for ballot access, where determining constitutionality of a county-based requirement was a fact-intensive process. Order of the district court vacated, case remanded.
Trial court erred in relying on the dead mans act to grant summary judgment in favor of executrix in appellants action seeking specific performance of a partnership agreement and a declaration that a purported merger of the partnership into a LLC was null and void because appellant produced sufficient evidence in the form of documents to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the partnership continued and the validity of the merger did not hinge on appellants ability to testify. Reversed.
Trial court properly terminated appellants case for lack of activity under rule 1901 even though there was no local rule implementing rule 1901 at the time because the lack of a local rule did not render the court powerless, the court complied with the minimum standards for notice set out in rule 1901(c) and the trial court was not required to hold an evidentiary hearing as to appellants reasons for her delay. Affirmed.
Defendant failed to demonstrate that the two-year delay between the occurrence of the alleged crime and her arrest prejudiced her by impeding her ability to mount a defense to the charges asserted by the commonwealth. The court denied defendants omnibus pretrial motion.
The court granted defendants motion for summary judgment in plaintiffs §1983 action seeking damages for the loss of his building as well as for personal property in the building after city ordered demolition of the building as a threat to public safety when part of the front of the building collapsed because plaintiff never identified a policy, custom or practice of the city that caused any constitutional violations, plaintiff took ad-vantage of his post-deprivation remedies and nothing in that process was inadequate and it was just
Objection to employer hospitals vaccination requirement for employees not religious in nature, and therefore not subject to protection, where alleged religious beliefs were mere rejection of scientific consensus rather than an attempt to address deep questions. Order of the district court affirmed.
The trial court did not err in setting aside an upset sale of taxpayers property where the Fayette County Tax Claim Bureau failed to make reasonable efforts to locate the imprisoned taxpayer after a certified mailing was returned unclaimed. The appellate court affirmed the trial courts order setting aside the tax sale.
1 minute read