Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
18 results for '* judge:"District Judge Schmehl"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-01-22
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: Education
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Schmehl
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-5032
Plaintiff moved for partial reconsideration in his action alleging claims under the Rehabilitation Act for failure to accommodate, disability discrimination, disparate impact, retaliation and interference and §1983 claims when he was denied the accommodation of remote teaching in 2021 after his heart transplant required him to use immunosuppressive medications which placed him at a higher risk from COVID-19 and court found university's full-time full-duty-policy had an adverse impact on him but that there was no cause of action under
Publication Date: 2024-01-08
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Energy | Retail
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Schmehl
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-953
Defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff's declaratory judgment action regarding a franchise for lack of personal jurisdiction and court found defendants were, in effect, "passive" buyers of the unilateral decision made by Circle K and plaintiff to assign the franchise agreement to plaintiff and court transferred the case to Texas. Motion granted and case transferred.
Publication Date: 2023-10-09
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Electronics | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Schmehl
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-4352
Defendant moved for an independent medical examination in plaintiff's Americans with Disabilities Act and Pennsylvania Human Relations Act action asserting she was fired due to her disability and court found plaintiff placed her mental health condition in controversy, defendant showed good cause for its request to conduct an IME and court denied a protective order limiting the scope of plaintiff's deposition to exclude any inquiry into the origins of her post traumatic stress disorder. Motion granted, motion denied.
Publication Date: 2023-08-28
Practice Area: Litigation
Industry: Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Schmehl
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 16-5209
Defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff's complaint on the ground that state court rulings precluded plaintiff's claims under the doctrine of Noerr Pennington immunity. The court granted the motion.
Publication Date: 2023-07-31
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Transportation
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Schmehl
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-3991
Court denied employer's motion for summary judgment without prejudice to employee providing requested medical documentation, since employee was merely placed on medical hold and was not disqualified or terminated from work. Defendant's motion for summary judgment denied in part and granted in part.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Patrick S. Montoya, Ervin A. Gonzalez, Ervin A. Gonzalez
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2023-04-10
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry: Transportation
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Schmehl
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-1889
Defendant moved to have plaintiff's putative Fair Labor Standards Act collective action transferred to the Eastern District of Texas and court found judicial economy and the interests of justice favored keeping the case before this court because under developing case law, a Texas court might lack jurisdiction over many or all of the opt-in plaintiffs. Motion denied.
Publication Date: 2023-03-06
Practice Area: Damages
Industry: Education
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Schmehl
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-4983
Pursuant to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C., plaintiffs could not recover compensatory damages for emotional distress based on claims brought under Title IX of the Education Amendments, §504 of the Rehabilitation Act and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The court granted in part defendant's motion for summary judgment.
Publication Date: 2022-10-03
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Biotechnology | Health Care | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Schmehl
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-5659
Under applicable Delaware law, fraud claims could not be asserted to evade settlement agreement that included non-reliance clause where the alleged fraud did not relate to any provisions of the settlement. Defendants' motion to dismiss granted.
Publication Date: 2022-06-13
Practice Area: Consumer Protection
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Schmehl
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0654
The court dismissed plaintiff's claim that defendant used deceptive means to attempt to collect a debt where the letter defendant sent to plaintiff complied with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and did not raise any "overshadowing" or "inconsistency" issues. The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment.
Publication Date: 2022-06-06
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Schmehl
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0629
Defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff's breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty action over the operation of management services provided for his investment portfolio and court found plaintiffs allegations of new advisors not answering his communications, a new investment strategy that was contrary to his investment goals and significant decline in trading sufficiently stated a plausible claim for relief. Motion dismissed.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read