• Commonwealth v. Moore

    Publication Date: 2024-03-01
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Olson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2510 EDA 2022

    Trial court should have denied suppression motion where totality of circumstances, including the fact that the subject vehicle was registered to someone whom defendant failed to explain his connection to, indicated that defendant lacked a privacy interest in the vehicle and thus defendant failed to bear his burden to prove that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy. Order of the trial court vacated, case remanded.

  • United States v. Long

    Publication Date: 2024-03-01
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Hardiman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 22-3033

    District court erred in excluding government's video and photo evidence in child pornography case in favor of a stipulated written description of the evidence and court found district court overestimated the extent to which the written descriptions reduced the exhibits' probative value under Rule 403, it was far from "obvious" that the potentially cumulative nature of the exhibits substantially outweighed the probative value of admitting any of the exhibits and district court erred in not viewing the exhibits before ruling. Vacated an

  • Johnson v. Wetzel

    Publication Date: 2024-03-01
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 497 M.D. 2018

    Petitioner indisputably received sufficient post-deduction due process and Department of Corrections was entitled to judgment in its favor as a matter of law in petitioner's action asserting deprivation of due process in DOC's deduction of court ordered costs from his inmate account. Petition dismissed.

  • Toland v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation & Parole

    Publication Date: 2024-03-01
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Jubelirer
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 315 M.D. 2018

    Petitioner and parole board argued discovery issues in petitioner's challenge to the denial of his 2017, 2018 and 2019 parole applications and court found the 2022 parole denial did not make the action moot, confidentiality regulation was not a per se bar to the production of documents in a parolee's file, board did not show the criminal history record information act applied and court dismissed board's objections to interrogatories as boilerplate. Motions granted in part and dismissed in part.

  • Commonwealth v. Umoh

    Publication Date: 2024-03-01
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Colins
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1464 WDA 2022

    Court could impose direct criminal contempt against criminal defendant who displayed emotional outburst after the reading of the verdict in defiance of the court's express instruction to maintain decorum, where such behavior in open court could undermine the court's authority. Judgment of sentence affirmed, case remanded for correction of clerical error.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New Jersey Medical Malpractice Law 2024

    Authors: Jonathan H. Lomurro, Gary L. Riveles, Abbott S. Brown

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Boyd v. Pennsylvania's Sentencing Scheme for Sentencing 18 Year Olds to Mandatory Life without Parole

    Publication Date: 2024-03-01
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Commonwealth Court
    Judge: Judge Covey
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 543 M.D. 2022

    Court lacked jurisdiction to consider petition seeking to invalidate mandatory life without parole sentences for 18-year-olds as violative of the Eighth Amendment and the Pennsylvania Constitution, as such a petition was only cognizable under the Post Conviction Relief Act and thus was untimely. Attorney General's preliminary objection sustained, case dismissed.

  • Commonwealth v. Baker

    Publication Date: 2024-02-23
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Panella
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 300 WDA 2023

    Court declined to second-guess sentence that deviated below guidelines where trial court adequately considered the totality of the circumstances, including the matters raised in the presentence investigation report and sentencing memorandum, defendant's history, and the strong arguments made by defense counsel. Judgment of sentence affirmed.

  • Commonwealth v. Schifano

    Publication Date: 2024-02-23
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Panella
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 264 WDA 2023

    Challenge to sufficiency of evidence supporting conviction for driving under the influence of marijuana failed where medical marijuana was included within the schedule designation under Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. Judgment of sentence affirmed.

  • United States v. Turner

    Publication Date: 2024-02-22
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Judge Hardiman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 22-3091

    Defendant appealed his conviction for Hobbs Act robbery.

  • Commonwealth v. Peralta

    Publication Date: 2024-02-16
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Bender
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 291 MDA 2023

    Commonwealth lacked sufficient evidence to convict appellant for illegally operating a vehicle without an ignition interlock device where it failed to present evidence that PennDOT notified licensee that his ignition interlock requirement continued after the statutory one-year term until he obtained an unrestricted license. Conviction reversed, judgment of sentence vacated.