Filter This View

  • Commonwealth v. Leonard

    Publication Date: 2017-11-07
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals | Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Ransom
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 17-1659

    Defendant subject to less than lifetime registration under SORNA where all of defendants sex offenses arose out of the same criminal episode, as SORNA required a conviction and then a subsequent act to trigger lifetime registration. Judgment of sentence vacated in part, case remanded for resentencing.

  • Commonwealth v. Becker

    Publication Date: 2017-11-07
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Lazarus
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 17-1657

    The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant parole out of concern for her unborn child given the substantial evidence of defendants heroin use while pregnant and her failure to seek treatment while previously out on probation. The appellate court affirmed a trial court order denying defendants petition for parole.

  • In the Interest of B.L.C

    Publication Date: 2017-11-07
    Practice Area: Attorney Rates and Arrangements | Criminal Law | Evidence
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Berks County
    Judge: Judge Lash
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 17-1629

    The court granted a motion to suppress evidence obtained from a checkpoint stop where the commonwealth failed to demonstrate sufficient factual data to support a checkpoint at the site in question, and where the search was not a voluntary, consensual one.

  • Commonwealth v. Lednum

    Publication Date: 2017-11-07
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Adams County
    Judge: Judge Wagner
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 17-1625

    An arresting office had a lawful basis to conduct a Terry frisk of defendant for the protection of officers or others nearby where the officer believed, from the totality of the circumstances, that defendant was involved in drug activity and also saw him make furtive motions suggestive of weapon possession.

  • Commonwealth v. Updike

    Publication Date: 2017-10-31
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Olson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 17-1606

    The Commonwealths blood draw evidence collected prior to the U.S. Supreme Courts decision in Birchfield v. North Dakota was admissible under the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule as defendant only sought suppression under the federal constitution. The court reversed the trial courts suppression order and remanded for further proceedings.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New Jersey Foreclosure Law & Practice 2024

    Authors: Scott T. Tross

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Commonwealth v. Smith

    Publication Date: 2017-10-31
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Moulton
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 17-1609

    The arresting officer involved in defendants case was not required to personally observe defendant involved in hand-to-hand illegal drug transactions and could rely on information provided by a fellow trooper, including a photo of the defendant, to determine whether he had reasonable suspicion to detain defendant. The court affirmed defendants judgment of sentence.

  • Commonwealth v. Succi

    Publication Date: 2017-10-31
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Shogan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 17-1610

    The trial court erred in finding that the defendant contractors actions were part of an ongoing course of conduct and, therefore, the statute of limitations had not run on the home improvement fraud and deceptive or fraudulent business practices charges against him. The court affirmed defendants judgment of sentence.

  • Commonwealth v. Carper

    Publication Date: 2017-10-31
    Practice Area: Constitutional Law | Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Olson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 17-1607

    Defendant properly preserved his state constitutional claim that his blood draw evidence was inadmissible, and the appellate court concluded that such evidence was inadmissible given that no good-faith exception to the evidence exclusionary rule exists under the state constitution. The court affirmed an order granting defendants habeas corpus motion.

  • Commonwealth v. McGarry

    Publication Date: 2017-10-31
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Dubow
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 17-1608

    The U.S. Supreme Courts holding in Birchfield v. North Dakota did not apply in this case, where defendant refused to submit to breath testing, as opposed to blood testing; however, defendant was entitled to relief on appeal from a trial court order denying his petition under the Post Conviction Relief Act without conducting a hearing. The appellate court vacated and remanded for further proceedings.

  • In the Interest of G.B.

    Publication Date: 2017-10-31
    Practice Area: Attorney Rates and Arrangements | Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
    Judge: Judge Hodge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 17-1578

    In this juvenile proceeding, the court held that trial as an adult for offenses committed as a minor was proper where the individual was not amenable to treatment and had committed similar crimes since reaching the age of majority.