• Doe v. Austin

    Publication Date: 2024-03-22
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: Education
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge Kearney
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 23-3287

    School district's alleged failure to train employees to work with students with emotional disorders lacked causal connection to student's harm and thus could not support a substantive due process claim. Defendants' motions to dismiss granted in part and denied in part.

  • Lloyd v. Manbel Devco I LP

    Publication Date: 2024-03-15
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: Hospitality and Lodging
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge Leeson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 5:23-cv-2261

    Defendant landlord moved to dismiss plaintiff tenant's discrimination and retaliation claims based on disability, failure to accommodate and the Fair Housing Act and court found plaintiff offered little more than conclusory allegations, apartment complex was not a place of public accommodation within the Americans with Disabilities Act and court dismissed the ADA claims with prejudice and granted leave to amend the FHA claims. Motion granted.

  • Anglemeyer v. Ammons

    Publication Date: 2024-02-23
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Porter
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 22-2788

    Appellants appealed the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of police officers on the basis of qualified immunity where the officers inflicted gratuitous injuries on family members, none of whom were suspected of any criminal activity, during a pre-dawn, no-knock raid on a residence. The court reversed, holding that the district court erred by predominantly crediting the officers' version of events for purposes of summary judgment, rather than construing the evidence in favor of plaintiffs, as non-movants.

  • Stoltie v. Cerilli

    Publication Date: 2024-02-16
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
    Judge: District Judge Schwab
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-267

    Defendants moved for summary judgment in inmate's action asserting retaliation and Americans with Disabilities Act discrimination and court found there was no evidence and no genuine issue of material fact to suggest any retaliation and plaintiff proffered no evidence to support his theory that defendants deliberately discriminated against him by placing him in a medical unit. Motion granted.

  • Truesdale v. Albert Einstein Healthcare Network

    Publication Date: 2024-02-16
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: Health Care
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge Slomsky
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 22-1597

    Defendants moved for summary judgment in plaintiff's Americans with Disabilities Act, Pennsylvania Human Relations Act and Philadelphia Fair Practice Ordinance action based on her termination for refusing a COVID-19 vaccination and court found there was a genuine issue dispute as to whether plaintiff had a disability, whether she was a qualified individual and whether defendants engaged in an interactive process but her retaliation claim failed because she failed to prove any retaliatory motive by defendants and defendants articulated

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New Jersey Estate Litigation 2014

    Authors: Michael R. Griffinger, Paul F. Cullum III

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Higgs v. Lanigan

    Publication Date: 2024-02-14
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 23-2851

    Plaintiff appealed the dismissal of his civil rights action for failure to prosecute.

  • In re: Mullings

    Publication Date: 2024-02-08
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 23-3170

    Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to compel the adjudication of his Rule 54(b) motion in an underlying civil action.

  • Falcone v. Dickstein

    Publication Date: 2024-02-06
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Judge Ambro
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 22-2702

    Plaintiffs appealed the district court's dismissal of their lawsuits.

  • Roberts v. Lau

    Publication Date: 2024-01-29
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: Legal Services | State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Montgomery-Reeves
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 22-2340

    District court properly denied Assistant District Attorney's motion to dismiss §1983 charges against him, for fabricating evidence, on absolute immunity grounds because ADA's alleged conduct served an investigatory function and ADA was not entitled to absolute immunity. Affirmed.

  • Oross v. Kutztown Univ.

    Publication Date: 2024-01-22
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: Education
    Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
    Judge: District Judge Schmehl
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-5032

    Plaintiff moved for partial reconsideration in his action alleging claims under the Rehabilitation Act for failure to accommodate, disability discrimination, disparate impact, retaliation and interference and §1983 claims when he was denied the accommodation of remote teaching in 2021 after his heart transplant required him to use immunosuppressive medications which placed him at a higher risk from COVID-19 and court found university's full-time full-duty-policy had an adverse impact on him but that there was no cause of action under