Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
16 results for '* judge:"Judge Cunningham"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-03-22
Practice Area: Expert Witnesses
Industry: Insurance
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Cunningham
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 210201573
In this §1925(a) opinion, the trial court urged the Superior Court to affirm its decision to reconsider the preclusion of the plaintiff's expert witness and removing the nonsuit it granted as a result so that the case could be remanded for a full trial on the merits.
Publication Date: 2024-02-16
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Cunningham
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 210702537
In this case involving adverse possession of land fenced in by appellee and her late husband to make a side yard in 1988, the court asked the Superior Court to affirm its ruling in favor of appellee.
Publication Date: 2024-02-09
Practice Area: Motor Vehicle Torts
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas
Judge: Judge Cunningham
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 221001274
In a §1925(a) opinion, the trial court urged the Superior Court to affirm its order granting summary judgment to the defendant based on collateral estoppel following an arbitration in which the plaintiff was found to be 100% liable for the motor vehicle collision at issue, a settlement based on the arbitration award, the payment of the settlement amount, and the filing of a new lawsuit by plaintiff and her husband based on the same motor vehicle collision.
Publication Date: 2024-02-02
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry: Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Cunningham
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 210300058
Premises liability defendants appealed the court's order granting reconsideration and vacating its earlier order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment. The court concluded that its decision should be affirmed where plaintiff's motion for reconsideration demonstrated the existence of a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether plaintiff saw a defect in a curb before she tripped and fell.
Publication Date: 2023-12-11
Practice Area: Litigation
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Cunningham
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 190902671
In an opinion filed pursuant to Pa.R.App.P. 1925(a), the court asked the Superior Court to affirm the court's order attesting that a protective order precluding a zoom deposition of plaintiff's expert was in effect and that all testimony at trial was to be presented in person.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: George Bochetto, David P. Heim, John A. O’Connell, Robert S. Tintner
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2023-10-16
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry: Health Care
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Cunningham
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 200202192
In a slip-and-fall case, plaintiff appealed the denial of her motion for post-trial relief, complaining that defendant's failure to file a timely answer to her complaint constituted an admission to its negligence. The court filed an opinion pursuant to Pa.R.App.P. 1925(a) requesting affirmance of its decision finding that plaintiff's allegations of negligence and causation were conclusions of law, not factual averments, and defendant's failure to answer them did not constitute an admission.
Publication Date: 2023-10-02
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry: Health Care
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Cunningham
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 210700236
Slip-and-fall plaintiff appealed the court's order denying her motion for post-trial relief. The court held that defendant did not admit plaintiff's allegations of negligence and causation by failing to timely respond to her original complaint, and thus the court's order denying plaintiff's motion should be affirmed.
Publication Date: 2022-12-19
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Cunningham
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 210900716
Court affirmed decision dismissing appellant's complaint for failure to prosecute on the grounds that appellant repeatedly failed to respond to appellees' preliminary objections, filed multiple amended complaints, and failed to effectuate proper service of any of the complaints on appellees.
Publication Date: 2022-11-21
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Cunningham
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 210201867
Plaintiff could not maintain a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress against defendant where she did not file her claim within two years of becoming aware of an audio recording that gave rise to her claim as well as the allegedly negative effect the tape was having on her family. The court recommended affirmance.
Publication Date: 2022-04-18
Practice Area: Discovery
Industry: Education
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Cunningham
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0269
The court, in this Rule 1925(a) opinion, reaffirmed their decision to compel defendant school's disclosure of various documents. The court sought appellate affirmance.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read