Pennsylvania firms are cracking down and regulating artificial intelligence use in the office, even as they begin to explore how generative AI tools can help maximize attorney efficiency in their day-to-day practices.

Concerns about using AI while practicing law reached a fever pitch upon the revelation that a New York lawyer used ChatGPT to write a legal brief full of fake case citations, resulting in a $5,000 sanction against the lead lawyer and his associate.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]