The lawyers who admitted to using fake case citations generated by ChatGPT in a court filing will have to pay $5,000 in fines and reach out to each judge falsely identified as an author of the fake filings, U.S. District Court Judge Kevin Castel of the Southern District of New York ordered in a 34-page opinion Thursday.

Castel found that Steven Schwartz of Levidow, Levidow & Oberman and his associate Peter LoDuca acted in bad faith when they made false statements to the court, but he did not order the attorneys to apologize, noting that “a compelled apology is not a sincere apology.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]