100 Jewish Lawyers Stand Against Judge Accused of Using Racist Slurs Toward Inmate
"It is beyond dispute that a trial conducted before a racist judge who boasts of his bigotry is no trial at all," the amicus brief said.
September 05, 2019 at 06:13 PM
4 minute read
More than 100 Jewish attorneys and four religious organizations have filed an amicus brief siding with a death-row inmate who's seeking a new trial amid allegations the judge referred to him using racist slurs about his Jewish heritage.
"The judicial system must purge itself of the resulting vestige of bias that undermines public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of our judiciary," the brief said. "No individual should be executed without getting a fair trial untainted by considerations of race."
The attorneys and groups filed the brief in the appeal of Randy Halprin, a member of the "Texas 7," a group of inmates who escaped prison and went on a crime spree that ended with the murder of a Dallas police officer in 2000.
Halprin was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to the death penalty. He has filed multiple appeals in state and district courts, arguing that he must get a new trial because then- Dallas County Criminal District Judge Vickers "Vic" Cunningham's judicial bias denied him his right to due process. Most recently, Halprin asked the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals to stay his execution as a Dallas County district court considers his application for writ of habeas corpus.
Halprin's motion claimed that in addition to the racial slurs, Cunningham "bragged about his role in convicting and sentencing to death the Jewish and Latino members of the Texas 7."
Cunningham, who was a judge for 10 years and now operates a Dallas solo practice, didn't immediately return a call seeking comment. However, he told the Dallas Morning News that he denied the allegations and believe they were fabrications that originated from his estranged brother and his friends.
Marc Stanley, principal of The Stanley Law Group in Dallas, helped organize the amicus brief and get 109 Texas attorneys to join it, as well as the American Jewish Committee, The Union for Reform Judaism, The Central Conference of American Rabbis and Men of Reform Judaism. It only took three or four days to find 109 lawyers who wanted to join, he noted.
"I just think it's outrageous if a judge holds beliefs like that. And if in fact he made those comments about Halprin, it totally offends all our notions about the system of justice and the rule of law," Stanley said. "If it was Latino, if it was African American, if it was Muslim—anything—everybody in this country is entitled to a judge who can call the balls and strikes of trial without prejudice."
The amicus brief said that if the allegations about Cunningham are true, then Halprin must get a new trial before an impartial judge. It acknowledged that Halprin is charged with a horrible crime and that the signers didn't know if he's guilty or if he received an appropriate sentence. But that's irrelevant, the brief said, because a fair trial must come first.
The lawyers wrote that they tell clients who are culturally diverse that judges do their best to judge impartially, regardless of race, national origin, gender or religion. They said their experience has been that most judges strive to do that.
"It is beyond dispute that a trial conducted before a racist judge who boasts of his bigotry is no trial at all," the brief said. "This is a capital murder case, in which an individual's life is in the balance, making it all the more urgent that credible allegations of bias are fully aired and determined."
Seminole solo practitioner Paul Mansur, who represents Halprin, didn't immediately return a call seeking comment.
Read the amicus brief:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All11 Red State AGs Demand Damages in Antitrust Lawsuit Shaming ESG Climate Investors
3 minute readEven With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250