0 results for 'Wells Fargo'
Court OKs Suits Over Denied Mortgage Modifications
Homeowners who enter into trial agreements to modify their mortgages under the federal Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) and comply with the terms can sue for breach of contract if a modification is denied and might even have a consumer fraud claim, a New Jersey appeals court has held in a precedential decision of first impression.Baril v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff Fails to Show Reasonable Reliance, Injury Caused by Alleged MisrepresentationWells Fargo Faces Trial on Mortgage-Modification Claims
A federal appellate court revived a pro se homeowner's case against Wells Fargo Bank for its alleged refusal to consider him for a mortgage loan modification program required by the terms of the company's settlement in a class action.4th DCA Reverses Boca Raton Foreclosure
A missing property description cost Wells Fargo a foreclosure in the Fourth District Court of Appeal.Panel Upholds Contract Breach Claim Over Football Club Debt
An investment fund that served as a creditor to former owners of the Liverpool Football Club avoided being outscored by its opponent Thursday when an appellate panel held it properly alleged a $70 million breach of contract claim against the competing lender that provided additional loan financing.Bernstein Litowitz Targets Banks in New RMBS Assault
Judging by the flurry of lawsuits Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann just unleashed against some of the world's top banks, mortgage-backed securities litigation has life in it yet.Bernstein Litowitz Targets Banks in New RMBS Assault
Judging by the flurry of lawsuits Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann just unleashed against some of the world's top banks, mortgage-backed securities litigation has life in it yet.Wells Fargo Bank v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
Claims Over JPMorgan's Misrepresentations In 2002 Texas Mall Contract Are Time BarredWells Fargo Bank v. Davidson Kempner Capital Mgmt. LLC
Agreement Unambiguous; Purchase Option Not Waived by Prior Directing SecurityholderIn Response, Lundy Calls Latest Claims By Pitt Firm 'Implausible and Insufficient' '
Calling it the "third bite at the proverbial apple," Philadelphia personal injury firm Lundy Law and advertising firm Titan have responded to competitor Larry Pitt & Associates' second amended complaint in an ongoing antitrust battle by saying the Pitt firm has "stretched the facts as far as truth will allow—and beyond."Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now