Calling it the “third bite at the proverbial apple,” Philadelphia personal injury firm Lundy Law and advertising firm Titan have responded to competitor Larry Pitt & Associates’ second amended complaint in an ongoing antitrust battle by saying the Pitt firm has “stretched the facts as far as truth will allow—and beyond.”
The Pitt firm filed its second amended complaint Jan. 2 after U.S. District Judge Cynthia M. Rufe of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania issued a Dec. 13, 2013, opinion dismissing without prejudice the Pitt firm’s Sherman Act, unfair competition and tortious interference with contract claims, saying the plaintiff failed to show that Lundy Law’s exclusive advertising contracts with the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA), KYW, the Wells Fargo Center and the Berks Area Regional Transportation Authority (BARTA) were unlawful.
