Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Total'

You can use to get even better search results
May 13, 2002 |

Digests of Recent Opinions

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION Arbitration * Admission of Evidence * Videotape * Authentication AFSCME District Council 88 v. County of Lehigh, PICS Case No. 02-0640 (Pa. Commw. April 30, 2002) Leadbetter, J. (9 pages). The arbitrator did ...
32 minute read
April 24, 2006 |

Unpublished Opinions

Unpublished state and federal court opinions.
41 minute read
October 23, 2009 |

Unpublished Opinions

Unpublished state and federal court decisions.
50 minute read
February 24, 2003 |

Top 10 Texas Settlements in 2002

Texas Blue Sheet, a weekly publication of The National Law Journal's Litigation Services Network and an affiliate of Texas Lawyer, ranked the top 10 settlements in Texas during 2002.
14 minute read
September 17, 2010 |

Unpublished Opinions

Unpublished state and federal court decisions.
43 minute read
December 01, 2010 |

Big Suits

Mirror Worlds v. Apple; U.S. v. Novartis; In re Lehman Brothers Holdings; Fogel et al. v. Farmers Group, Inc., et al.
8 minute read
December 20, 2010 |

Practice By Practice: 2010's Substantive Law Developments

Practitioners write about the year's developments in their practice areas, including banking and business, bankruptcy, criminal law, energy, family law, immigration, insurance, intellectual property, labor and employment, personal-injury law, real estate, securities and tax law. In all, the 22 writers reflect on substantive legal developments in 13 practice areas for 2010.
35 minute read
November 06, 2000 |

High Profile Pleading: E-Data's (Interactive Gift Express) Winning Brief in Business Method Patent Appeal

Interactive Gift Express v. CompuServ, Fed. Cir., filed June 1, 1999, decided Nov. 3, 2000
51 minute read
August 31, 2011 |

Court Rings in New Standards for Eyewitness Identification and Sounds the Death Knell for Res Gestae

WA trial court has no authority to deny defendants their constitutional right of confrontation merely because the court believes that cross-examination will be of little use.
45 minute read
Barclays Capital Inc. v. Theflyonthewall.com, Inc., 10-1372-cv
Publication Date: 2011-06-22
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Pooler, Sack, and Raggi, C.JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: R. Bruce Rich, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP (Benjamin Marks, Jonathan Bloom, and Lisa R. Eskow, of counsel), New York, NY, for Appellees.
For defendant: Glenn F. Ostrager, Ostrager Chong Flaherty & Broitman P.C. (Joshua S. Broitman, of counsel), New York, NY, for Appellant.
Case number: 10-1372-cv

Cite as: Barclays Capital Inc. v. Theflyonthewall.com, Inc., 10-1372-cv, NYLJ 1202498007313, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided June 20, 2011)Before: Pooler, Sack, and Rag

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources