0 results for 'Swartz Campbell'
Jury Award of $7.9 Million May Set Record for Bad Faith Verdicts
In what appears to be Pennsylvania's largest insurance bad faith verdict ever, a federal jury has awarded more than $7.9 million -- including $6.25 million in punitive damages -- in a doctor's claim that his insurer's failure to offer the limits of his policy led to a $2.5 million malpractice verdict against him. After the malpractice verdict, the doctor assigned his rights to the plaintiffs to pursue his claim against his insurer, as well as rights to pursue a legal malpractice case against his lawyer.The Money Keeps Rolling In as Candidates Disclose Contributions
The money is flowing in this year's race for two open Supreme Court seats, and a large portion of it is coming from a 527 group headed up by Philadelphia trial lawyers.100 Largest Law Firms Alphabetically
The following is a list of the 100 largest law firms in Pennsylvania sorted alphabetically as reported in the 2010 edition of PaLAW magazine.Phila. Jury Awards $3 MillionFor Worker's Soft-Tissue Injury
After a four-day trial, a Philadelphia jury delivered a $3 million verdict yesterday to a railroad worker who sustained soft-tissue injuries when he fell from a locomotive's ladder. "If there ever was a textbook case of negligence, this was it," said Robert S. Goggin III, the plaintiff's attorney. The complaint was brought under the Federal Employee Liability Act, which was the plaintiff's only remedy, Goggin said.Jury Awards Nearly $4 Million in Cases Seeking Damages for Exposure to Asbestos
A Philadelphia jury last week awarded nearly $4 million in damages to two men diagnosed with terminal cancer stemming from asbestos exposure. Because the defendants settled after the first phase of the ``reverse-bifurcated'' trial, the jury decided only medical causation and compensatory damages, never reaching a second phase in which liability would have been apportioned among the defendant companies, who are all manufacturers, distributors and suppliers of asbestos products.Penn. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Ruling On Pollution Exclusion Provisions
The pollution-exclusion clause of a commercial liability insurance policy precludes coverage for injuries caused by a worker's exposure to fumes of a "useful product," the Pa. Supreme Court has decided. Pointing out that the issue has been a hot topic in insurance-coverage litigation, the court noted that there is a "wide divergence of viewpoints" across the country.State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now
Creating a Culture of Compliance
Brought to you by Ironclad
Download Now
A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now