0 results for 'Southwire Company'
Publicaciones E Impresos Paso v. Jurado
Publication Date: 2023-02-27 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Civil Procedure |
Communications and Media
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals Judge: Justice Rodriguez Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 08-22-00044-CV
A media company, that was sued by a former Mexican governor in Texas for slander, failed to prove on appeal that the trial court erred in denying its motions for special appearance on personal jurisdiction grounds.
Dawson v. James
Publication Date: 2022-12-12 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Insurance Litigation |
Trusts and Estates
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals Judge: Justice Rodriguez Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 08-21-00175-CV
A California woman, who was sued in Texas over her ex-husband's insurance proceeds, successfully proved on appeal that the trial court erred in refusing to grant her a special appearance.
Adecco USA Inc. v. Staffworks Inc.
Publication Date: 2022-11-10 Practice Area: Business Torts
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York, U.S. - NDNY Judge: District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiffs: Courtney C. Williams, Esq., of counsel, Gordon & Rees LLP, Franklin, Tennessee.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs: John Tyler Mills, Esq., of counsel, Gordon & Rees LLP, New York, New York.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs: Tyler L. Martin, Esq., Tyler Tarney, Esq., of counsel, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP, Columbus, Ohio. For defendant: Attorneys for Defendants: Preston L. Zarlock, Esq., Joshua S. Glasgow, Esq., Mary Jane Morley, Esq., of counsel, Phillips Lytle LLP, One Canalside, Buffalo, New York. Case number: 6:20-CV-744
Tortious Interference Claims Stand; Litigation Privilege Not Applied to Defamation Case
Copeland v. Mayers
Publication Date: 2022-10-10 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Civil Procedure |
Deals and Transactions
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals Judge: Justice Rodriguez Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 08-20-00236-CV
Appellee, Justin Mayers, sued three defendants for money had and received, promissory estoppel and unjust enrichment, claiming that they failed to pay him money they owed him on a sports bet. Mayers originally filed suit in County Court of Law No. 1 in Travis County, Texas, to which appellants each filed a special appearance, contesting the court's personal jurisdiction over them.
Revisiting New York's Witness Sequestration Rule
The application of New York's witness sequestration rule is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court. Its hallmark is the flexibility to apply the rule to guard against the risk of perjury. Counsel should be ready to ask the trial court to shape any sequestration rule to achieve this goal.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Representing High-Tech Companies
Authors: Gary M. Lawrence, Carl Baranowski
View this Book
View more book results for the query "Southwire Company"
Manufacturer Files Preemptive Litigation Claiming It Hasn't Engaged in Anticompetitive Conduct
This lawsuit was surfaced on Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
Gaddy v. Fenenbock
Publication Date: 2022-08-08 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Civil Procedure |
Trusts and Estates
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals Judge: Justice Alley Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 08-22-00041-CV
Weston Gaddy and Elysa Fenenbock are cousins, both beneficiaries of a trust established by their grandfather and shared with their parents.
Daneshgari et al. v. Patriot Towing Services, LLC
Publication Date: 2021-11-18 Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Automotive
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals Judge: Presiding Judge Dillard Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kasey Libby, Atlanta, for appellant. For defendant: Heather Wright, Victoria Kealy, (The Wright Firm, LLC), Atlanta, Howard Evans, (Howard R. Evans & Associates, Howard R. Evans, Attorney), Atlanta, R. Curd, (Curd Law Firm), Powder Springs, for appellee. Case number: A21A0887
Court reverses contempt order that improperly extended the term of a non-compete provision past its expiration in a non-competition agreement
Stalwart Films LLC, et al. v. Bernecker, et al.
Publication Date: 2021-04-13 Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry:
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals Judge: Presiding Judge Doyle Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jackson Dial, David Dial, Y. Williams, Joshua Wood, (Weinberg Wheeler Hudgins Gunn & Dial LLC), Atlanta, for appellant. For defendant: Rebecca Harris, (Franklin Law, LLC), Savannah, Gerald Davidson, (Mahaffey Pickens Tucker, LLP), Lawrenceville, Jeffrey Harris, Yvonne Godfrey, (Harris Lowry Manton LLP), Savannah, Peter Law, Brian Kaplan, (Law & Moran), Atlanta, for appellee. Case number: A20A1896
Tort Claims Against Production Company Were Barred by Exclusive Remedy Provision of Workers' Compensation Act; Defendants Owed No Duty to Stuntman Killed on the Set of The Walking Dead
In-House Leaders Join Advisory Council for Ethisphere's Equity and Social Justice Initiative
"Our participation in Ethisphere's Equity and Social Justice Initiative will help us maintain our commitment to being an anti-racist company over the long term," Tony West, Uber's chief legal officer, said in an email to Corporate Counsel.TRENDING STORIES
More from ALM
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Carolyn Burbrink, Uber Director of Volume Mobility Safety and Insurance Litigation 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Andy Goldberg, Laner Muchin Managing Partner 1 minute read
Resources
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now
Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now