0 results for 'Rio Tinto PLC'
More Steak Than Sizzle: Relativity Fest Kicks Off With RelativityOne Focus
The opening keynote may not have had a major bomb to drop, but Relativity CEO Andrew Sieja still introduced important new functionality with "entities," security features and more.Gender Diversity and Board Quotas
In their Corporate Governance column, David Katz and Laura McIntosh consider whether instituting gender quotas for boards of directors of public companies would be beneficial or harmful to the larger goals of gender parity and board diversity in the United States.Retaining Control over use of Technology-Assisted Review
A look at "Winfield v. City of New York" in view of three significant TAR cases authored by S.D.N.Y. Magistrate Judge Peck, and other illustrative cases, as well as suggestions for best practices.Reed Smith Hires Norton Rose Partner in Singapore
Daniel Perera is the second energy and natural resources partner the firm has hired in Southeast Asia over the past six months.Judge Andrew J. Peck, 1 of E-Discovery's Most Influential Figures, Retires From the Bench
After over two decades as a magistrate judge for the Southern District of New York, Peck will retire and join DLA Piper.Retired Federal Judges, Titans of E-Discovery, Debate the Review Revolution
At a recent Cardozo Law event, federal judges known for their e-discovery expertise discuss the state of e-discovery case law and best practices.Beyond Document Review: Meeting Other Big Data Challenges
Years after Judge Andrew Peck declared it to be “black letter law” in 'Rio Tinto', technology-assisted review has finally entered the mainstream among a growing suite of technology-driven e-discovery tools. It is taking a bit longer, however, for practitioners to fully recognize that document review over large data populations is an information retrieval task.An E-Discovery Opinion That's Boring: Have We Come That Far? Part I
In Winfield v. New York, 15-CV-05236 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 27, 2017), Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker ruled on the plaintiffs' claims that the defendant did not properly produce e-discovery. The opinion is, paradoxically, interesting because it is boring.Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now