Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Rio Tinto Group'

You can use to get even better search results
April 06, 2015 | Law.com

A Predictive Coding Opinion That Predicts the Past?

In , 14 Civ. 3042 (S.D.N.Y. March 2, 2015), U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew Peck of the Southern District of New York, one of brightest and most informed jurists writing about e-discovery, summarized how, in the past three years, "the case law has developed to the point that it is now black-letter law" that courts will permit producing parties in e-discovery matters to use technology-assisted review and, in particular, predictive coding to review documents for production.
8 minute read
RIO Tinto PLC, Plaintiff v. Vale S.A., et al., Defendants, 14 Civ. 3042
Publication Date: 2015-03-20
Practice Area: Civil Practice
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: Magistrate Judge Andrew Peck
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Counsel for Plaintiff Rio Tinto plc.: William A. Burck, Eric C. Lyttle, Michael J. Lyle, Stephen M. Hauss, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Washington, DC.
For defendant: Counsel for Defendant Vale S.A.: Jonathan I. Blackman, Lewis J. Liman, Boaz S. Morag, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP.
Case number: 14 Civ. 3042

Cite as: RIO Tinto PLC v. Vale S.A., 14 Civ. 3042, NYLJ 1202721158780, at *1 (SDNY, Decided March 2, 2015) 14 Civ. 3042 Magistrate Judge Andre

Rio Tinto PLC, Plaintiff v. Vale S.A., Benjamin Steinmetz, BSG Resources Limited, BSG Resources (Guinea) Ltd., BSGR Guinea Ltd. BVI, BSG Resources Guinee Sarl, Frederic Cilins, Mamadie Toure, and Mahmoud Thiam, Defendants, 14 Civ. 3042 (RMB) (AJP)
Publication Date: 2014-12-29
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Richard Berman
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 14 Civ. 3042 (RMB) (AJP)

Cite as: Rio Tinto PLC v. Vale S.A., 14 Civ. (RMB) (AJP), NYLJ 1202713115952, at *1 (SDNY, Decided December 17, 2014) 14 Civ.

Mujica v. Airscan Inc.
Publication Date: 2014-11-12
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Before: Jay S. Bybee and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges, and Thomas S. Zilly, Senior District Judge.*
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Paul L. Hoffman (argued), Adrienne J. Quarry, and Victoria Don, Schonbrun DeSimone Seplow, Harris Hoffman & Harrison, LLP, Venice, California; Terry Collingsworth and Christian Levesque, Conrad & Scherer, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Daniel M. Kovalik, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Bridget Arimond, Center for International Human Rights, Northwestern University Law School, Chicago, Illinois, for Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.
For defendant: Daniel P. Collins (argued), Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant Occidental Petroleum Corporation.
Case number: No. 10-55515 No. 10-55516 No. 10-55587

Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 12819 LUIS ALBERTO GALVIS MUJICA, on behalf of himself and as representative of the Estates of Tereza Mujica Hernan, Edilma Leal P

November 05, 2014 |

King & Wood Mallesons Adds Brisbane Partner

Jamie Wells moves from Allens, where he was head of national workplace and employee relations.
1 minute read
In Re Aluminum Warehousing Antitrust Litigation, 13-md-2481 (KBF)
Publication Date: 2014-09-05
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Katherine B. Forrest
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 13-md-2481 (KBF)

Cite as: In Re Aluminum Warehousing Antitrust Litigation, 13-md-2481 (KBF), NYLJ 1202668967193, at *1 (SDNY, Decided August 29, 2014) 13-md-2481 (KBF) D

John Doe I v. Nestle USA, Inc.
Publication Date: 2014-09-04
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Paul Hoffman (argued), Schonbrun DeSimone Seplow Harris Hoffman & Harrison, LLP, Venice, California; Terrence Patrick Collingsworth, Conrad & Scherer, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff-Appellants.
For defendant: Andrew John Pincus (argued), Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC; Craig A. Hoover and Christopher Todd Handman, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, D.C.; Julie A. Shepard, Jenner & Block, LLP, Los Angeles, California; Jonathan H. Blavin and Kristin Linsley Myles, Munger Tolles & Olson, LLP, San Francisco, California; Brad D. Brian and Daniel Paul Collins, Munger Tolles & Olson, LLP, Los Angeles, California; Lee H. Rubin, Mayer Brown LLP, Palo Alto, California, for Defendants-Appellees.
Case number: No. 10-56739

Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 10396 JOHN DOE I; JOHN DOE II; JOHN DOE III, individually and on behalf of proposed class members; GLOBAL EXCHANGE, Plaintiffs-App

September 04, 2014 |

Squire Patton Boosts Australia With Team Hire

Partner Simon Rear joins the firm's Perth office with three associates from boutique Allion Legal.
1 minute read
May 05, 2014 |

Zhong Lun Adds Shanghai Partner

Litigator Gary Gao was previously with Duan & Duan.
1 minute read
March 31, 2014 |

BlackRock Worried Over Barrier Reef Eco-Risks

The potential threats posed by coal and natural gas projects to the Great Barrier Reef are prompting close scrutiny from investors as a global campaign against fossil fuels gains momentum.
4 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now