Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Patterson Belknap'

You can use to get even better search results
Mullins v. City of New York, 08-1839-cv
Publication Date: 2010-11-23
Practice Area: Constitutional Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Pooler, Katzmann, and Hall, C.JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Stephen P. Younger, (Clay J. Pierce and A. Leah Vickers, on the brief) Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, New York, NY; Gregory K. McGillivary, Woodley & McGillivary (on the brief), Washington, DC; Andrew Quinn, Quinn & Mellea, LLP (on the brief), White Plains, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellees.
For defendant: Karen M. Griffin (of counsel), Andrez Carberry, Francis F. Caputo (on the brief), for Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellants.
Case number: 08-1839-cv

Cite as: Mullins v. City of New York, 08-1839-cv, NYLJ 1202475224106, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided November 16, 2010)Before: Pooler, Katzmann, and Hall, C.JJ.p

Boies Schiller Price Discrimination Claims Tossed in 19-Year-Old Pharma Case
Publication Date: 2012-08-17
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

After nearly two decades of litigation against some of the biggest drug companies in the country, we're betting the last thing a group of individual pharmacies wanted to hear was that their claims were small potatoes.

March 01, 1999 |

Branding is Law Firms' New Buzzword

Long a cornerstone of consumer marketing, the notion of branding is being stretched in a new direction these days by law firm consultants and their in-house counterparts. Despite all the effusiveness, though, no one seems to agree on exactly what branding is or how a law firm is supposed to do it. Nor is there yet any evidence that branding actually works in the legal business.
10 minute read
July 31, 2008 |

Associates Survey 2008

Smaller firms often outscore larger ones on our annual survey of midlevel job satisfaction. It may be because a more intimate atmosphere breeds happiness. Maybe it's because associates have more responsibility. Perhaps it's because they have a better chance of making partner. In these charts, firms are grouped roughly according to size. In the first category are firms whose annual gross revenues are too low to qualify for the Am Law 200. These are the smallest firms that took part in our survey. In the second category are Am Law Second Hundred firms?numbers 101-200 on the most recent Am Law 200 survey (July.) In the final category are firms that appear on our most recent Am Law 100 (May) or Global 100 (October 2007) survey. For a full methodology, click here.
16 minute read
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory v. Ropes & Gray LLP, 10-CV-661 (ADS)(AKT)
Publication Date: 2011-01-26
Practice Area: Legal Profession
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
Judge: District Judge Arthur D. Spatt
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff: By: Peter I. Bernstein, Esq., Chad E. Ziegler, Esq., Of Counsel, Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C., Garden City, New York
For defendant: Attorneys for Defendant Ropes & Gray LLP: By: Philip R. Forlenza, Esq., Eugene M. Gelernter, Esq., Nicolas Commandeur, Esq., Irena Royzman, Esq., Of Counsel, Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, New York, New York Local Counsel for Defendant Matthew P. Vincent: By: Anthony P. Colavita, Esq., Scott E. Kossove, Esq., Of Counsel, L'Abbate, Balkan, Colavita & Contini, L.L.P., Garden City, New York Attorneys for Defendant Matthew P. Vincent: By: Robert J. Muldoon, Esq., Thomas W. Kirchofer, Esq., Of Counsel. Sherin and Lodgen LLP, Boston, MA
Case number: 10-CV-661 (ADS)(AKT)

Cite as: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory v. Ropes & Gray LLP, 10-CV-661 (ADS)(AKT), NYLJ 1202479207738, at *1 (EDNY, Decided January 22, 2011)District Judge A

August 10, 2007 |

2nd Circuit Sorts Out 'Truth' From 'Puffery' in Advertising Dispute

The 2nd Circuit has upheld a decision preliminarily enjoining DirecTV from airing television commercials on its high-definition service's quality in markets where Time Warner Cable operates, but the court also found that a federal district judge erred in preventing DirecTV from running some of its Internet ads. Second Circuit Judge Chester J. Straub wrote, "The Internet advertisements' depictions of cable ... are not even remotely realistic. It is difficult to imagine that any consumer" would be fooled.
5 minute read
November 19, 2007 |

The Firm Reports

67 minute read
Dickstein Shapiro Wins $482 Million Infringement Verdict Against J&J
Publication Date: 2011-01-28
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

This marks the second huge jury verdict that the firm has won for Dr. Bruce Saffran, who has sued to enforce his patent for medical stents.

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources