Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Patterson Belknap'

You can use to get even better search results
J&J Points Fingers at Pharma Rivals in Risperdal Kickbacks Case
Publication Date: 2011-11-11
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

The "everybody else was doing it too" defense is usually a long shot. But in a False Claims Act case alleging that the company paid kickbacks to the national pharmacy Omnicare, Johnson & Johnson's lawyers at Nixon Peabody want a judge to compel the Justice Department to fork over documents to back J&J's claims that its actions amounted to business-as-usual.

Credit Union Regulator Launches New Litigation Blitz
Publication Date: 2013-09-24
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

The National Credit Union Administration and its lawyers are back with more mortgage-backed securities claims against more banks—not to mention an opening salvo for the agency in the ongoing LIBOR litigation.

Even Big Boys Can Cry: New York Judge Rejects 'Sophisticated Party' Defense, Refuses to Dismiss MBIA's Suit Against Credit Suisse
Publication Date: 2010-08-11
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

The bank argued that MBIA should have conducted its own due diligence on the mortgage-backed securities it agreed to insure, rather than relying on Credit Suisse's representations. The judge, who's overseeing a similar Ambac suit against Credit Suisse, disagreed.

March 08, 2007 |

How Sweet It Isn't: Equal, Splenda to Clash in Trial

In a battle between the leading sugar substitutes -- Equal and Splenda -- a federal judge has ruled a jury must decide whether Splenda's claim that the product is "made from sugar so it tastes like sugar" is misleading. In Merisant Co. v. McNeil Nutritionals, the judge rejected a defense argument that Splenda's claim is literally true. The opinion sets the stage for a trial that promises to be a battle of experts, including a neurobiologist testifying on the biology of sweet tastes.
7 minute read
Mullins v. City of New York, 08-1839-cv
Publication Date: 2010-11-23
Practice Area: Constitutional Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Pooler, Katzmann, and Hall, C.JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Stephen P. Younger, (Clay J. Pierce and A. Leah Vickers, on the brief) Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, New York, NY; Gregory K. McGillivary, Woodley & McGillivary (on the brief), Washington, DC; Andrew Quinn, Quinn & Mellea, LLP (on the brief), White Plains, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellees.
For defendant: Karen M. Griffin (of counsel), Andrez Carberry, Francis F. Caputo (on the brief), for Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellants.
Case number: 08-1839-cv

Cite as: Mullins v. City of New York, 08-1839-cv, NYLJ 1202475224106, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided November 16, 2010)Before: Pooler, Katzmann, and Hall, C.JJ.p

Boies Schiller Price Discrimination Claims Tossed in 19-Year-Old Pharma Case
Publication Date: 2012-08-17
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

After nearly two decades of litigation against some of the biggest drug companies in the country, we're betting the last thing a group of individual pharmacies wanted to hear was that their claims were small potatoes.

March 01, 1999 |

Branding is Law Firms' New Buzzword

Long a cornerstone of consumer marketing, the notion of branding is being stretched in a new direction these days by law firm consultants and their in-house counterparts. Despite all the effusiveness, though, no one seems to agree on exactly what branding is or how a law firm is supposed to do it. Nor is there yet any evidence that branding actually works in the legal business.
10 minute read
July 31, 2008 |

Associates Survey 2008

Smaller firms often outscore larger ones on our annual survey of midlevel job satisfaction. It may be because a more intimate atmosphere breeds happiness. Maybe it's because associates have more responsibility. Perhaps it's because they have a better chance of making partner. In these charts, firms are grouped roughly according to size. In the first category are firms whose annual gross revenues are too low to qualify for the Am Law 200. These are the smallest firms that took part in our survey. In the second category are Am Law Second Hundred firms?numbers 101-200 on the most recent Am Law 200 survey (July.) In the final category are firms that appear on our most recent Am Law 100 (May) or Global 100 (October 2007) survey. For a full methodology, click here.
16 minute read
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory v. Ropes & Gray LLP, 10-CV-661 (ADS)(AKT)
Publication Date: 2011-01-26
Practice Area: Legal Profession
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
Judge: District Judge Arthur D. Spatt
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff: By: Peter I. Bernstein, Esq., Chad E. Ziegler, Esq., Of Counsel, Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C., Garden City, New York
For defendant: Attorneys for Defendant Ropes & Gray LLP: By: Philip R. Forlenza, Esq., Eugene M. Gelernter, Esq., Nicolas Commandeur, Esq., Irena Royzman, Esq., Of Counsel, Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, New York, New York Local Counsel for Defendant Matthew P. Vincent: By: Anthony P. Colavita, Esq., Scott E. Kossove, Esq., Of Counsel, L'Abbate, Balkan, Colavita & Contini, L.L.P., Garden City, New York Attorneys for Defendant Matthew P. Vincent: By: Robert J. Muldoon, Esq., Thomas W. Kirchofer, Esq., Of Counsel. Sherin and Lodgen LLP, Boston, MA
Case number: 10-CV-661 (ADS)(AKT)

Cite as: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory v. Ropes & Gray LLP, 10-CV-661 (ADS)(AKT), NYLJ 1202479207738, at *1 (EDNY, Decided January 22, 2011)District Judge A

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources