0 results for 'Miller Martin'
Attorney-Client Privilege and Dual-Purpose Communications
Inquiries received from Michael J. Hutter's previous Evidence column, together with the Supreme Court's grant of certiorari and then subsequent dismissal of the appeal as improvidently granted in 'In re Grand Jury', suggest a discussion of the status if dual purpose communications in New York is both timely and appropriate.Questioning Adverse Parties and Hostile Witnesses on the Direct Case: New York's Approach
Evidence columnist Michael J. Hutter explores New York's rules governing the questioning, including impeachment, of adverse parties and hostile witnesses on a party's direct case.Death Penalty Debate as 'Stocking Strangler' Execution Nears
A defense lawyer for Georgia death row inmate Carlton Gary argues his innocence. Attorney General Chris Carr summarizes the case.Role of the Arons Interview of Nonparty Physicians
In their Medical Malpractice Defense column, John L.A. Lyddane and Barbara D. Goldberg write that in the nine years since the Court of Appeals decided 'Arons v. Jutkowitz', the approach to informal interviews of nonparty treating physicians has stabilized, and the courts have protected this valuable resource for the trial attorney.View more book results for the query "Miller Martin"
Fiduciary Exception to Privilege in Shareholder Actions
In his Evidence column, Michael J. Hutter discusses whether a corporation and its attorneys must disclose privileged communications relevant to corporate matters to shareholder plaintiffs in actions based upon breaches by management of their fiduciary duties or other wrongdoing arising out of those matters.Impeachment of Trial Witnesses and the Collateral Evidence Rule
In his Evidence column, Michael J. Hutter furthers his discussion of New York's collateral evidence rule, which bars the contradiction of a witness's answers concerning collateral matters by the introduction of extrinsic evidence for the sole purpose of impeaching credibility.Testimony on Knife Adds Another Claim to Tankleff Suit
As Martin Tankleff presses his case against Suffolk County and various detectives for their liability in his now-vacated convictions in the murder of his parents, a federal magistrate judge has decided he can include a claim that defendants failed to disclose a medical examiner's doubts about the purported murder weapon.Company Seeks $495K on Top of $500K Trade Secrets Verdict
An Atlanta plastics distributor that was awarded almost $500,000 by a Fulton County jury in a trade secrets case is seeking more than $485,000 in fees and expenses.Admissibility of Habit Evidence in Negligence Actions
In his Evidence column, Michael J. Hutter writes that while habit evidence is admissible under FRE 406 in negligence actions to show what occurred on the occasion of a person's injury, or careful or careless conduct on the issue of the person's negligence or comparative fault without any limitations, present New York law is restrictive regarding the admissibility of habit evidence in negligence actions.Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now
Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now