Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith Limited'

You can use to get even better search results
Nokia Corporation v. InterDigital, Inc., 0-1358-cv
Publication Date: 2011-05-25
Practice Area: Civil Practice
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Walker, B.D. Parker and Hall, C.JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Patrick J. Flinn (Thomas J. Parker, Janice A. Christensen, on the brief), Alston & Bird LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
For defendant: Gideon A. Schor (Joshua A. Plaut, on the brief), Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellants.
Case number: 0-1358-cv

Cite as: Nokia Corporation v. InterDigital, Inc., 10-1358-cv, NYLJ 1202494895345, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided May 23, 2011)Before: Walker, B.D. Parker and Hall, C.J

March 08, 2012 |

Asia Deal Digest: March 8, 2012

Davis Polk and Paul Weiss lead on two Japanese bond deals; Clifford Chance lands the premium role as a bank unloads its insurance businesses; and Edwards Wildman's Hong Kong affiliate helps a Chinese oil giant float fresh stock.
4 minute read
March 27, 2006 |

Topical Index to Articles

Topical Index to Articles
42 minute read
September 19, 2012 |

Lawyers look to protect their own in class action battle

On Supreme Court briefs, law firm names can usually be found toward the bottom, identifying the affiliation of the counsel of record. But in a pair of cases now pending before the court, law firms are top-of-the-page petitioners, signaling a major new effort to convince the Supreme Court that lawyers and other "third parties" should not be sued in securities class actions.
4 minute read
August 11, 2009 |

Considering When Courts Should Override Parents' Decisions

Robert Z. Dobrish, the senior member of Dobrish Zeif Gross, writes that recently, a court rejected an arrangement that was inconsistent with the wishes of the children despite both parents' belief that it was in the children's best interests. The case was unique in its posture in that both parties stipulated to the facts and asked the court to decide the issue. Thus, a most interesting question remains: What would have happened if the parties had resolved the issue in a manner which was antagonistic to the desires of the children, but both parents sought to withdraw their proceeding and objected to the court's making its own determination? Would/should the court then have had the ability/temerity to make non-critical child rearing decisions when the child's parents made different choices?
9 minute read
Law Journal Press | Digital Book Limited Liability Companies and Limited Liability Partnerships Authors: Thomas A. Humphreys View this Book

View more book results for the query "Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith Limited"

May 31, 2007 |

Arbitration

William J.T. Brown, of counsel at LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene, & MacRae, writes that - although practitioners may not have noticed - New York's arbitration statute, the venerable CPLR Article 75, seems to have become a virtual dead letter.
10 minute read
April 30, 2010 |

Language Court's Focus in Cases Like 'Merck'

The U.S. Supreme Court's Merck opinion this week is in line with its recent interpretations of the Securities Exchange Act's private right of action.
9 minute read
March 20, 2002 |

Should Employees Share Their Arbitration Costs?

The use of arbitration to resolve employment-related disputes has grown exponentially. Ironically, the increased use of arbitration has generated significant litigation over the rules that should govern proceedings between employers and employees. In particular, the issue of cost allocation has arisen frequently, but the courts themselves are divided on cost-sharing provisions.
8 minute read
April 03, 2012 |

Recent Decisions on Empty Chair Defendants

In their Medical Malpractice column, Thomas A. Moore and Matthew Gaier of Kramer, Dillof, Livingston & Moore analyze two recent decisions, one that recognizes that the opportunity had by co-defendants to litigate the merits of claims against another defendant on a summary judgment motion precludes those claims from being re-litigated at trial for the purposes of apportionment, and another that discussed the effect of an automatic bankruptcy stay on empty chair strategies.
13 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources