0 results for 'Facebook, Inc.'
How Meta Finds the Right Teams for the Right Cases at the Right Prices
The second part of the Litigation Daily's conversation with Nikki Stitt Sokol, director and associate general counsel for Meta Platforms Inc., delves into what she looks for when hiring outside counsel.
How Meta Finds the Right Teams for the Right Cases at the Right Prices
The second part of the Litigation Daily's conversation with Nikki Stitt Sokol, director and associate general counsel for Meta Platforms Inc., delves into what she looks for when hiring outside counsel.
Meta's Nikki Stitt Sokol on Learning 'Litigation Is Always About a Story'
Sokol, who has been managing litigation in-house at the company since shortly after the Facebook IPO, says it's important to learn about the people behind a business and what they're trying to accomplish.
Meta's Nikki Stitt Sokol on Learning 'Litigation Is Always About a Story'
Sokol, who has been managing litigation in-house at the company since shortly after the Facebook IPO, says it's important to learn about the people behind a business and what they're trying to accomplish.
Meta's Nikki Stitt Sokol on Learning 'Litigation Is Always About a Story'
Sokol, who has been managing litigation in-house at the company since shortly after the Facebook IPO, says it's important to learn about the people behind a business and what they're trying to accomplish.
Galgano v. County of Putnam New York
Publication Date: 2024-04-22 Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY Judge: District Judge Kenneth M. Karas Attorneys: For plaintiff: Counsel for Plaintiff: Marc V. Ayala, Esq., Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, Armonk, NY. For defendant: Counsel for Defendant County of Putnam: Caroline B. Lineen, Esq., Karen C. Rudnicki, Esq., Lewis R. Silverman, Esq., Joshua M. Goldstein, Esq., Silverman & Associates, White Plains, NY.
Counsel for Defendant County of Putnam, Adam Levy, Andres Gil, Henry Lopez, and Lourdes Gonzalez: Shannon S. Brady, Esq., Putnam County Law Department, Carmel, NY.
Counsel for Defendants Adam Levy, Andres Gil, Henry Lopez, and Lourdes Gonzalez: Michael A. Miranda, Esq., Maurizio Savoiardo, III, Esq., Richard B. Epstein, Esq., Miranda Slone Sklarin Verveniotis, LLP, Mineola, NY.
Counsel for Defendants Adam Levy: Michael H. Sussman, Esq., Sussman & Watkins, Goshen, NY.
Counsel for Defendant Det. Michael T. Nagle: Alex J. Ru, Esq., Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, New York, NY.
Counsel for Defendant Det. Michael T. Nagle: Michael I. Goldman, Esq., Robert J. Pariser, Esq., Lydecker Diaz, Miami, FL. Case number: 16-CV-3572
Good Faith Exception Applies Although Search Warrants Were Facially Defective
Appellate Term, Second Department: April 15, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-04-15 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Term, Second Department, Second, Eleventh and Thirteenth JudicIal Districts & Ninth and Tenth JudicIal DisTRICTS Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Decision & Orders on Motions decided on:March 1 to April 2, 2024
Rent Stabilization Association of N.Y.C., Inc. v. McKee
Publication Date: 2024-04-12 Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York Judge: Justice Leslie A. Stroth Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 155789/2018
Court Finds No Actual Malice in Defendant's Statements; Defamation Action Dismissed
No More Safety Under the Radar: Antitrust Enforcement Against Roll-ups and Serial Acquisitions
The FTC and DOJ are geared up to investigate and challenge serial acquisitions or roll-ups by private equtity firms. Many of these transactions have flown "under the radar" because they were below the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act's reporting threshold.
Searching for Yes: Defining Consent in Website Data Processing and Online Litigation
Liability under state WESCA claims turns on whether there was there an interception of a communication (and if so, where that interception took place), and whether the party whose communication was intercepted had granted consent. This article focuses on the third element—consent.TRENDING STORIES
More from ALM
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Carolyn Burbrink, Uber Director of Volume Mobility Safety and Insurance Litigation 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Andy Goldberg, Laner Muchin Managing Partner 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at Legalweek 2024: Priori CEO and Co-Founder Basha Rubin; Shook, Hardy & Bacon Partner Patrick Oot 1 minute read
Resources
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now
Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now